linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/2] gfs2: Rework read and page fault locking
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 12:38:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703113801.GD25523@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200703095325.1491832-3-agruenba@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:53:25AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> So far, gfs2 has taken the inode glocks inside the ->readpage and
> ->readahead address space operations.  Since commit d4388340ae0b ("fs:
> convert mpage_readpages to mpage_readahead"), gfs2_readahead is passed
> the pages to read ahead locked.  With that, the current holder of the
> inode glock may be trying to lock one of those pages while
> gfs2_readahead is trying to take the inode glock, resulting in a
> deadlock.
> 
> Fix that by moving the lock taking to the higher-level ->read_iter file
> and ->fault vm operations.  This also gets rid of an ugly lock inversion
> workaround in gfs2_readpage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>

> -/**
> - * __gfs2_readpage - readpage
> - * @file: The file to read a page for
> - * @page: The page to read
> - *
> - * This is the core of gfs2's readpage. It's used by the internal file
> - * reading code as in that case we already hold the glock. Also it's
> - * called by gfs2_readpage() once the required lock has been granted.
> - */
> -
>  static int __gfs2_readpage(void *file, struct page *page)

You could go a little further and rename this function to plain
gfs2_readpage().

gfs2_internal_read() should switch from read_cache_page() to
read_mapping_page().

>  {
>  	struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(page->mapping->host);
>  	struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(page->mapping->host);
> -
>  	int error;
>  
>  	if (i_blocksize(page->mapping->host) == PAGE_SIZE &&
> @@ -505,36 +494,11 @@ static int __gfs2_readpage(void *file, struct page *page)
>   * gfs2_readpage - read a page of a file
>   * @file: The file to read
>   * @page: The page of the file
> - *
> - * This deals with the locking required. We have to unlock and
> - * relock the page in order to get the locking in the right
> - * order.
>   */

I'd drop the kernel-doc comments on method implementations entirely,
unless there's something useful to say ... which there isn't any more
(yay!)

> @@ -598,16 +562,9 @@ static void gfs2_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac)
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = rac->mapping->host;
>  	struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(inode);
> -	struct gfs2_holder gh;
>  
> -	gfs2_holder_init(ip->i_gl, LM_ST_SHARED, 0, &gh);
> -	if (gfs2_glock_nq(&gh))
> -		goto out_uninit;
>  	if (!gfs2_is_stuffed(ip))
>  		mpage_readahead(rac, gfs2_block_map);

I think you probably want to make this:

	if (i_blocksize(page->mapping->host) == PAGE_SIZE &&
	    !page_has_buffers(page))
		error = iomap_readahead(rac, &gfs2_iomap_ops);
	else if (!gfs2_is_stuffed(ip))
		error = mpage_readahead(rac, gfs2_block_map);

... but I understand not wanting to make that change at this point
in the release cycle.

I'm happy for the patches to go in as-is, just wanted to point out these
improvements that could be made.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03  9:53 [RFC v2 0/2] Fix gfs2 readahead deadlocks Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-07-03  9:53 ` [RFC v2 1/2] fs: Add IOCB_NOIO flag for generic_file_read_iter Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-07-03 11:41   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-05 15:08     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-07-03  9:53 ` [RFC v2 2/2] gfs2: Rework read and page fault locking Andreas Gruenbacher
2020-07-03 11:38   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-07-03 11:44     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-03 19:24 ` [RFC v2 0/2] Fix gfs2 readahead deadlocks Linus Torvalds
2020-07-03 19:26   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200703113801.GD25523@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).