linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/numa: remove redundant iteration over memblock.reserved
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:23:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200728142348.GE10792@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200728141504.GC3655207@kernel.org>

On 07/28/20 at 05:15pm, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:02:54PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/28/20 at 08:11am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug() function first traverses numa_meminfo
> > > regions to set node ID in memblock.reserved and than traverses
> > > memblock.reserved to update reserved_nodemask to include node IDs that were
> > > set in the first loop.
> > > 
> > > Remove redundant traversal over memblock.reserved and update
> > > reserved_nodemask while iterating over numa_meminfo.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> > > index 8ee952038c80..4078abd33938 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> > > @@ -498,31 +498,25 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
> > >  	 * and use those ranges to set the nid in memblock.reserved.
> > >  	 * This will split up the memblock regions along node
> > >  	 * boundaries and will set the node IDs as well.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * The nid will also be set in reserved_nodemask which is later
> > > +	 * used to clear MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag.
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel,
> > > +	 *   numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved
> > > +	 *   memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory()
> > > +	 *   reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics.
> > > +	 *   These ranges will remain with nid == MAX_NUMNODES. ]
> > >  	 */
> > >  	for (i = 0; i < numa_meminfo.nr_blks; i++) {
> > >  		struct numa_memblk *mb = numa_meminfo.blk + i;
> > >  		int ret;
> > >  
> > >  		ret = memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, &memblock.reserved, mb->nid);
> > > +		node_set(mb->nid, reserved_nodemask);
> > 
> > Really? This will set all node id into reserved_nodemask. But in the
> > current code, it's setting nid into memblock reserved region which
> > interleaves with numa_memoinfo, then get those nid and set it in
> > reserved_nodemask. This is so different, with my understanding. Please
> > correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> You are right, I've missed the intersections of numa_meminfo with
> memblock.reserved.
> 
> x86 interaction with membock is so, hmm, interesting...

Yeah, numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug() intends to find out any memory node
which has reserved memory, then make it as unmovable. Setting all node
id into reserved_nodemask will break the use case of hot removing hotpluggable
boot memory after system bootup.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28  5:11 [PATCH 00/15] memblock: seasonal cleaning^w cleanup Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: simplify kvm_cma_reserve() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 02/15] dma-contiguous: simplify cma_early_percent_memory() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  6:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm, xtensa: simplify initialization of high memory pages Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  8:09   ` Max Filippov
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 04/15] arm64: numa: simplify dummy_numa_init() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-29  8:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-07-30 12:03   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 05/15] h8300, nds32, openrisc: simplify detection of memory extents Mike Rapoport
2020-07-29 11:41   ` Stafford Horne
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 06/15] powerpc: fadamp: simplify fadump_reserve_crash_area() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30 12:15   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-01 10:18     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-08-01 10:53       ` Hari Bathini
2020-08-02 13:14       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 07/15] riscv: drop unneeded node initialization Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 08/15] mircoblaze: drop unneeded NUMA and sparsemem initializations Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 09/15] memblock: make for_each_memblock_type() iterator private Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  1:52   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 10/15] memblock: make memblock_debug and related functionality private Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  1:54   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 11/15] memblock: reduce number of parameters in for_each_mem_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  2:22   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 12/15] arch, mm: replace for_each_memblock() with for_each_mem_pfn_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 13/15] arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range() Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 15:02   ` Emil Renner Berthing
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/numa: remove redundant iteration over memblock.reserved Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 10:44   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-28 10:56     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 11:31       ` Ingo Molnar
2020-07-28 11:02   ` Baoquan He
2020-07-28 14:15     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-28 14:23       ` Baoquan He [this message]
2020-07-28  5:11 ` [PATCH 15/15] memblock: remove 'type' parameter from for_each_memblock() Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200728142348.GE10792@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).