linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>,
	Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/6] decrease unnecessary gap due to pmem kmem alignment
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:34:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729033424.2629-1-justin.he@arm.com> (raw)

When enabling dax pmem as RAM device on arm64, I noticed that kmem_start
addr in dev_dax_kmem_probe() should be aligned w/ SECTION_SIZE_BITS(30),i.e.
1G memblock size. Even Dan Williams' sub-section patch series [1] had been
upstream merged, it was not helpful due to hard limitation of kmem_start:
$ndctl create-namespace -e namespace0.0 --mode=devdax --map=dev -s 2g -f -a 2M
$echo dax0.0 > /sys/bus/dax/drivers/device_dax/unbind
$echo dax0.0 > /sys/bus/dax/drivers/kmem/new_id
$cat /proc/iomem
...
23c000000-23fffffff : System RAM
  23dd40000-23fecffff : reserved
  23fed0000-23fffffff : reserved
240000000-33fdfffff : Persistent Memory
  240000000-2403fffff : namespace0.0
  280000000-2bfffffff : dax0.0          <- aligned with 1G boundary
    280000000-2bfffffff : System RAM
Hence there is a big gap between 0x2403fffff and 0x280000000 due to the 1G
alignment.
 
Without this series, if qemu creates a 4G bytes nvdimm device, we can only
use 2G bytes for dax pmem(kmem) in the worst case.
e.g.
240000000-33fdfffff : Persistent Memory 
We can only use the memblock between [240000000, 2ffffffff] due to the hard
limitation. It wastes too much memory space.

Decreasing the SECTION_SIZE_BITS on arm64 might be an alternative, but there
are too many concerns from other constraints, e.g. PAGE_SIZE, hugetlb,
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, page bits in struct page ...

Beside decreasing the SECTION_SIZE_BITS, we can also relax the kmem alignment
with memory_block_size_bytes().

Tested on arm64 guest and x86 guest, qemu creates a 4G pmem device. dax pmem
can be used as ram with smaller gap. Also the kmem hotplug add/remove are both
tested on arm64/x86 guest.

This patch series (mainly patch6/6) is based on the fixing patch, ~v5.8-rc5 [2].

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/19/67
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/8/1546
Jia He (6):
  mm/memory_hotplug: remove redundant memory block size alignment check
  resource: export find_next_iomem_res() helper
  mm/memory_hotplug: allow pmem kmem not to align with memory_block_size
  mm/page_alloc: adjust the start,end in dax pmem kmem case
  device-dax: relax the memblock size alignment for kmem_start
  arm64: fall back to vmemmap_populate_basepages if not aligned  with
    PMD_SIZE

 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c    |  4 ++++
 drivers/base/memory.c  | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/dax/kmem.c     | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/ioport.h |  3 +++
 kernel/resource.c      |  3 ++-
 mm/memory_hotplug.c    | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 mm/page_alloc.c        | 14 ++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1



             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29  3:34 Jia He [this message]
2020-07-29  3:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/memory_hotplug: remove redundant memory block size alignment check Jia He
2020-07-29  3:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] resource: export find_next_iomem_res() helper Jia He
2020-07-29  3:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/memory_hotplug: allow pmem kmem not to align with memory_block_size Jia He
2020-07-29  3:34 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/page_alloc: adjust the start,end in dax pmem kmem case Jia He
2020-07-29  3:34 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] device-dax: relax the memblock size alignment for kmem_start Jia He
2020-07-29  3:34 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: fall back to vmemmap_populate_basepages if not aligned with PMD_SIZE Jia He
2020-07-29  6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] decrease unnecessary gap due to pmem kmem alignment David Hildenbrand
2020-07-29  8:27   ` Justin He
2020-07-29  8:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-29  9:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-29  9:35       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-29 13:00         ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-29 13:03           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-07-29 14:12             ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-30  2:17         ` Justin He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200729033424.2629-1-justin.he@arm.com \
    --to=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).