From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76887C433E0 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146572070B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OAGjokDV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 146572070B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5F3036B0003; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5A3496B0006; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4B8586B0007; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0247.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.247]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AE96B0003 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C1F7282A for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77091288162.04.cloth86_420abb326f73 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA7C8091793 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:06:18 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: cloth86_420abb326f73 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4490 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:05:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596031557; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BTKkyVnlyjFIf0Nn25e2vWeUAEq+tU6vjwTYmnht5bU=; b=OAGjokDVekNs9xz0XlYG7NquVWzqaXdWMXzQUuYFr+rKKfwCMXiGZhHMnBA89IlRvNZBCG Vaz+gDQQawC0uOUcz2e8FO6A7eW4Rqjg6c7bE7LPFxlor/A4RnjCCIm8BaNCo6zj029BcD +sCbB/71NoatIAKc60lDrkwmrtOA53s= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-141-34FSvcv1N9uiE31TWU9pBQ-1; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:05:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 34FSvcv1N9uiE31TWU9pBQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021968064B1; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-32.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A99756BA; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:05:28 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , "Michael S . Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] mm/page_isolation: drop WARN_ON_ONCE() in set_migratetype_isolate() Message-ID: <20200729140528.GF10792@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20200630142639.22770-1-david@redhat.com> <20200630142639.22770-4-david@redhat.com> <20200729132410.GG14854@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DA7C8091793 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 07/29/20 at 03:37pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 29.07.20 15:24, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 06/30/20 at 04:26pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> Inside has_unmovable_pages(), we have a comment describing how unmovable > >> data could end up in ZONE_MOVABLE - via "movable_core". Also, besides > > ~~~ 'movablecore' > >> checking if the first page in the pageblock is reserved, we don't > >> perform any further checks in case of ZONE_MOVABLE. > >> > >> In case of memory offlining, we set REPORT_FAILURE, properly > >> dump_page() the page and handle the error gracefully. > >> alloc_contig_pages() users currently never allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. > >> E.g., hugetlb uses alloc_contig_pages() for the allocation of gigantic > >> pages only, which will never end up on the MOVABLE zone > >> (see htlb_alloc_mask()). > >> > >> Cc: Andrew Morton > >> Cc: Michal Hocko > >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin > >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > >> --- > >> mm/page_isolation.c | 16 ++++++---------- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c > >> index 553b49a34cf71..02a01bff6b219 100644 > >> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c > >> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c > >> @@ -58,16 +58,12 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_ > >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags); > >> if (!ret) { > >> drain_all_pages(zone); > >> - } else { > >> - WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE); > >> - > >> - if ((isol_flags & REPORT_FAILURE) && unmovable) > >> - /* > >> - * printk() with zone->lock held will likely trigger a > >> - * lockdep splat, so defer it here. > >> - */ > >> - dump_page(unmovable, "unmovable page"); > >> - } > >> + } else if ((isol_flags & REPORT_FAILURE) && unmovable) > > > > This else if branch should be enclosed in brace? > > > > Not necessarily. And it will be gone in the next patch in this series :) OK, that's fine. Thanks.