From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F98C433E0 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1B32076E for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9C1B32076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 032878D0104; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EFDD78D0081; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:07:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DC6C18D0104; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:07:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0241.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.241]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D108D0081 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7078D3625 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77109585546.29.bite54_3102d2626f9e Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE1D18086E5F for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:07 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: bite54_3102d2626f9e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2645 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6737AB3E; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:07:04 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Alex Shi Cc: Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 00/21] per memcg lru lock Message-ID: <20200803150704.GV5174@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1595681998-19193-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <49d4f3bf-ccce-3c97-3a4c-f5cefe2d623a@linux.alibaba.com> <08c8797d-1935-7b41-b8db-d22f054912ac@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <08c8797d-1935-7b41-b8db-d22f054912ac@linux.alibaba.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3FE1D18086E5F X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 30-07-20 10:16:13, Alex Shi wrote: >=20 >=20 > =E5=9C=A8 2020/7/30 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=882:06, Hugh Dickins =E5=86=99=E9=81= =93: > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Alex Shi wrote: > >> > >> Is there any comments or suggestion for this patchset? > >> Any hints will be very appreciated. > >=20 > > Alex: it is now v5.8-rc7, obviously too late for this patchset to mak= e > > v5.9, so I'm currently concentrated on checking some patches headed f= or > > v5.9 (and some bugfix patches of my own that I don't get time to send= ): > > I'll get back to responding on lru_lock in a week or two's time. >=20 > Hi Hugh, >=20 > Thanks a lot for response! It's fine to wait longer. > But thing would be more efficient if review get concentrated... > I am still too new in mm area. I am sorry and owe you a review but it is hard to find time for that. This is a large change and the review will be really far from trivial. If this version is mostly stable then I would recommend not posting new versions and simply remind people you expect the review from by a targeted ping. --=20 Michal Hocko SUSE Labs