From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E7AC433DF for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D061F2177B for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dYvoJcTE" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D061F2177B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4682A6B0002; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 418C36B0003; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:25:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 32E1B6B0005; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:25:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0175.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0446B0002 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 21:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1232362E for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:25:57 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77122031154.27.stamp86_5917dae26fbc Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3AB3D663 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:25:57 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: stamp86_5917dae26fbc X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2412 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B832206B5; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 01:25:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596763556; bh=mA/awtDZ4yMki7SF0GBozP3n+dALHx4VvvVdvvuQTg8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dYvoJcTEvXHqFP5FwYVm1gBTYqZu8kiddHmoWKhQgx1+Lw0OXOD7nABF/x8GMbg8t V7yB1BureSyuML7pk/LzSQO0CyOADWd7U7d2f0yIgK3YsTcHuGUPdEAdEX7YczjyyQ aE88OvCf1CNxX9ay7Qh29SuMK2kyvvETSZj41nQw= Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 18:25:55 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Hugh Dickins , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmstat: fix /proc/sys/vm/stat_refresh generating false warnings Message-Id: <20200806182555.d7a7fc9853b5a239ffe9f846@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200806233804.GB1217906@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20200714173920.3319063-1-guro@fb.com> <20200730162348.GA679955@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20200801011821.GA859734@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20200804004012.GA1049259@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20200806233804.GB1217906@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AE3AB3D663 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:38:04 -0700 Roman Gushchin wrote: > it seems that Hugh and me haven't reached a consensus here. > Can, you, please, not merge this patch into 5.9, so we would have > more time to find a solution, acceptable for all? No probs. I already had a big red asterisk on it ;)