From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7613FC433E1 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372582075D for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gYz3tdpY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 372582075D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9EB556B0003; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 99BD06B0005; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:21:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 88AE86B0006; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:21:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0164.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.164]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734626B0003 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5244DDF for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:21:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77136685962.05.rule27_190c31626fdf Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEE018021874 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:21:21 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: rule27_190c31626fdf X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2363 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf41.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 376E1206DC; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:21:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597112479; bh=HU0RLG4moDfMRlsMhMfGS7F281kMpizylGvKs2qA890=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gYz3tdpYES59ro1cZ97vrJAQzeLwlHDeZOhKcJ7DNekx2+kaotF2mfR5AdLR5Iu8U /SMS6huxJx945h2reSvWrz6XAOXSKptdBVMxWPozVO9ku7jebtUdlRH9MItxgbZsFx TlgbS1AMQK/dXjzlQKfK9XLoYPgiOUrN9aumVyP8= Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:21:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Baoquan He , Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Michal Hocko , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Mike Rapoport , Pankaj Gupta , Qian Cai Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE Message-Id: <20200810192118.34a33d64e357ce5dd6f7614d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20200804194142.28279-1-david@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0AEE018021874 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:56:32 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 04.08.20 21:41, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > @Andrew can we give this a churn and consider it for v5.9 in case there > > are no more comments? > > @Andrew, Ping, so I assume we'll target v5.10? Yep, sorry. Merging a significant patch series during the merge window(!) would be quite extraordinary and I don't think that anything in this patchset justifies such an action?