From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00ABC433DF for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FAC206B2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rqcyJCpY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 63FAC206B2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D44726B0006; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:10:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CF5666B0007; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:10:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BE3D06B0008; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:10:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DFD6B0006 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:10:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0F04DA2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77138019378.18.fly09_1f0ad4426fe2 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC0100EC678 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: fly09_1f0ad4426fe2 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5046 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com (mail-lj1-f193.google.com [209.85.208.193]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id g6so13003080ljn.11 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 04:10:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2nNPNm4tYKrvoUdNlKVXxkf9XuHNQ7X8ruGTZJkTmKI=; b=rqcyJCpYWkgePj6wCghY2mm2R68DDv1IQPZ5xxBRV//iwhNZgnMSiCOSogCoHZ6W5v zNBmo+A0lsapXmVFinLB2wQMktPxNwqCbWzyUBWw+hj34soNXsZcJU9BQvA6OlGeQsd5 EuiJIciJCtDRw1b0z4/f9OobXUuHSzC9nmwI4HgtHgFu7NPubGR4skaDViYXByqUxBO/ +drZRnnEvsYnDTpAMTeQLbV75ABoNgSa7CI5hMJoiGUxcN84xfTXpWPNtwjfF23FHLV/ w+ing8OcBJgAGzXX25rZgb4xBILmmdcwkJr8/vLepPMw7IbNJOQGJDp5e/MEAhh8tGkH SBuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2nNPNm4tYKrvoUdNlKVXxkf9XuHNQ7X8ruGTZJkTmKI=; b=B0lY/GfaKFP/0EOHa26ffzhi5+eYo/juflrC8L1/kQ6PUOs3O5Qt5Q5bA3ipe3ojvY FN/+a5tX98JyFfDHC2E7oxY+R5aQmzVOksUajbrAvSIliQeT6AeDV+136jlNzaPkfhrT jOS8ejNNwRlzYurD76TvzHUI4b8ZOLgAtr1/CIO+4tHeOx7VSKo6Igp/zdfrv6uNQ75B 8hvp86NwjZfExP7JxoLaCJgbExGNN4GDEes0HRlLyCZWbkuHsC2pXwdDngdVfClnzYl5 dNMoO+R87bwHWmHlqReuGleFdDs2wXFZisgxkjrEWVUPuyDEYQaJznV/vXx5cJUj1rsJ qvcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Qfa96zG6dYxmuWf+mjHhcOBx41VVMO6MHw7COth5bOzPCfqtR fQ305XyVWdNKDpHhXKtP3JA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQo4vZpVOoGhJK8aSvayeavCZybEoN+zL4WQVg+ujAkkJDfT0bBaWH22ZkcN8Xh24gVu3eiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8456:: with SMTP id u22mr2772006ljh.243.1597144226957; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 04:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p13sm12672000lfc.63.2020.08.11.04.10.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 04:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 13:10:23 +0200 To: Michal Hocko Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , LKML , RCU , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , "Paul E . McKenney" , Matthew Wilcox , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Joel Fernandes , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH 1/2] mm: Add __GFP_NO_LOCKS flag Message-ID: <20200811111023.GA5544@pc636> References: <20200809204354.20137-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20200809204354.20137-2-urezki@gmail.com> <20200810123141.GF4773@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200810160739.GA29884@pc636> <20200810192525.GG4773@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200811091807.GA2634@pc636> <20200811102124.GH4793@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200811102124.GH4793@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 16DC0100EC678 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 11-08-20 11:18:07, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:25:25PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 10-08-20 18:07:39, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > > On Sun 09-08-20 22:43:53, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > [...] > > > > As i described before, calling the __get_free_page(0) with 0 as argument > > > > will solve the (a). How correctly is it? From my point of view the logic > > > > that bypass the wakeup path should be explicitly defined. > > > > > > gfp_mask == 0 is GFP_NOWAIT (aka an atomic allocation request) which > > > doesn't wake up kswapd. So if the wakeup is a problem then this would be > > > a way to go. > > > > > What do you mean Michal? gfp_mask 0 != GFP_NOWAIT: > > > > #define GFP_NOWAIT (__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM) > > > > it does wakeup of the kswapd. Or am i missing something? Please comment. > > If we are about to avoid the kswapd, should we define something special? > > > > #define GFP_NOWWAKE_KSWAPD 0 > > Sorry, I was more cryptic than necessary. What I meant is that > GFP_NOWAIT is the basic non-sleepable allocation. It does wake up > kswapd but a lack of it can be expressed GFP_NOWAIT & ~__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM > which is 0, now. The mouthfull variant is better for future > maintainability. > OK. I got it anyway. Just decided to clarify. -- Vlad Rezki