From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vinmenon@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: fix core hung in free_pcppages_bulk()
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:07:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200813070744.GB9477@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b07d2a6-8ce7-5957-8ca5-a8d977852e14@redhat.com>
On Tue 11-08-20 10:29:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
> I was wondering if we should rather set all pageblocks to
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE in online_pages() before doing the online_pages_range()
> call, and do undo_isolate_page_range() after onlining is done.
>
> move_pfn_range_to_zone()->memmap_init_zone() marks all pageblocks
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE, and as that function is used also during boot, we could
> supply a parameter to configure this.
>
> This would prevent another race from happening: Having pages exposed to
> the buddy ready for allocation in online_pages_range() before the
> sections are marked online.
>
> This would avoid any pages from getting allocated before we're
> completely done onlining.
This sounds like a reasonable idea to me.
> We would need MIGRATE_ISOLATE/CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION also for
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
We already do depend on the memory isolation in the hotremove. Doing the
same for hotplug in general makes sense as well.
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-13 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 16:10 [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: fix core hung in free_pcppages_bulk() Charan Teja Reddy
2020-08-10 19:36 ` David Rientjes
2020-08-11 13:01 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2020-08-11 8:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-11 13:11 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2020-08-11 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-08-13 7:07 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200813070744.GB9477@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=charante@codeaurora.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).