linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.samsung@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Ajay kumar <ajaynumb@gmail.com>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	jean-philippe@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.ameer@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: IOVA allocation dependency between firmware buffer and remaining buffers
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:16:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924101640.GE2483160@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37e767b8-8ec4-ae80-ea0d-1caf3cdab8fa@samsung.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1795 bytes --]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:46:46AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> On 24.09.2020 10:28, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:48:26AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> It allows to remap given buffer at the specific IOVA address, although
> >> it doesn't guarantee that those specific addresses won't be later used
> >> by the IOVA allocator. Probably it would make sense to add an API for
> >> generic IOMMU-DMA framework to mark the given IOVA range as
> >> reserved/unused to protect them.
> > There is an API for that, the IOMMU driver can return IOVA reserved
> > regions per device and the IOMMU core code will take care of mapping
> > these regions and reserving them in the IOVA allocator, so that
> > DMA-IOMMU code will not use it for allocations.
> >
> > Have a look at the iommu_ops->get_resv_regions() and
> > iommu_ops->put_resv_regions().
> 
> I know about the reserved regions IOMMU API, but the main problem here, 
> in case of Exynos, is that those reserved regions won't be created by 
> the IOMMU driver but by the IOMMU client device. It is just a result how 
> the media drivers manages their IOVA space. They simply have to load 
> firmware at the IOVA address lower than the any address of the used 
> buffers.

I've been working on adding a way to automatically add direct mappings
using reserved-memory regions parsed from device tree, see:

    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200904130000.691933-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/

Perhaps this can be of use? With that you should be able to add a
reserved-memory region somewhere in the lower range that you need for
firmware images and have that automatically added as a direct mapping
so that it won't be reused later on for dynamic allocations.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-24 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-20 15:54 IOVA allocation dependency between firmware buffer and remaining buffers Ajay kumar
2020-04-24 15:04 ` Ajay kumar
2020-04-24 15:29   ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-24 16:15     ` Shaik Ameer Basha
2020-09-23  6:48       ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-23  6:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23  7:45           ` Ajay kumar
2020-09-23 13:47             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-23  8:25           ` Ajay Kumar
2020-09-24  8:28         ` Joerg Roedel
2020-09-24  8:46           ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 10:16             ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2020-09-24 10:40               ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-24 10:47                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 11:06                   ` Robin Murphy
2020-09-24 14:14                     ` Shaik Ameer Basha
2020-09-28  6:52                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 10:41               ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-24 14:33                 ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200924101640.GE2483160@ulmo \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=ajaynumb@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shaik.ameer@samsung.com \
    --cc=shaik.samsung@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).