linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Elfring" <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Wei Yongjun" <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
	"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/hmm/test: use after free in dmirror_allocate_chunk()
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 19:17:20 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200926221720.GK9916@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200926121402.GA7467@kadam>

On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 03:14:02PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The error handling code does this:
> 
> err_free:
> 	kfree(devmem);
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> err_release:
> 	release_mem_region(devmem->pagemap.range.start, range_len(&devmem->pagemap.range));
>                            ^^^^^^^^
> The problem is that when we use "devmem->pagemap.range.start" the
> "devmem" pointer is either NULL or freed.
> 
> Neither the allocation nor the call to request_free_mem_region() has to
> be done under the lock so I moved those to the start of the function.
> 
> Fixes: 1f9c4bb986d9 ("mm/memremap_pages: convert to 'struct range'")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v2: The first version introduced a locking bug
> v3: Markus Elfring pointed out that the Fixes tag was wrong.  This bug
> was in the original commit and then fixed and then re-introduced.  I was
> quite bothered by how this bug lasted so long in the source code, but
> now we know.  As soon as it is introduced we fixed it.
> 
> One problem with the kernel QC process is that I think everyone marks
> the bug as "old/dealt with" so it was only because I was added a new
> check for resource leaks that it was found when it was re-introduced.
> 
>  lib/test_hmm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Hi Andrew, 

I don't have have any hmm related patches this cycle, can you take
this into your tree?

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Thanks,
Jason


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-26 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-25 19:30 [PATCH v2] mm/hmm/test: use after free in dmirror_allocate_chunk() Markus Elfring
2020-09-26 12:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Dan Carpenter
2020-09-26 13:10   ` Markus Elfring
2020-09-26 22:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-09-29  0:52     ` Andrew Morton
2020-09-29  1:25       ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200926221720.GK9916@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).