From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFB1C433E7 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E6322284 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:42:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 71E6322284 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A29216B006C; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 06:42:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9D9CA6B006E; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 06:42:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 89FFF6B0070; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 06:42:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0022.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.22]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551C06B006C for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 06:42:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC275181AE868 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:42:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77352046926.12.iron59_3d08e68271e0 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7F71800FEB4 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:42:03 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: iron59_3d08e68271e0 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6624 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:42:02 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: U4EtkKmiz0ZpM8axN6K2HK1Vf5i6IrpXa73K69K0Ban7NhbpTjDLsa2U/4IdocN+3PXiRE/Y/y j4CTMeOHmQyg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9768"; a="182908801" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,354,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="182908801" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2020 03:42:01 -0700 IronPort-SDR: D5eqKzTjS4VWkdDx7L10EJhvpJmbWpaNFT2AjYNswUUzxVgophba1dI0Vl4ciDLSRhrLHR2HwJ Z2f9ybtMlUDw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,354,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="316996829" Received: from stinkbox.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.174]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 09 Oct 2020 03:41:55 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:41:54 +0300 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:41:54 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Daniel Vetter Cc: DRI Development , LKML , linux-s390 , linux-samsung-soc , Jan Kara , Kees Cook , KVM list , Jason Gunthorpe , Linux PCI , Linux MM , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , John Hubbard , Bjorn Helgaas , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , Linux ARM , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/17] drm/i915: Properly request PCI BARs Message-ID: <20201009104154.GR6112@intel.com> References: <20201009075934.3509076-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201009075934.3509076-18-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201009094750.GQ6112@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 12:01:39PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:59:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > When trying to test my CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM changes I realized t= hey > > > do nothing for i915. Because i915 doesn't request any regions, like > > > pretty much all drm pci drivers. I guess this is some very old > > > remnants from the userspace modesetting days, when we wanted to > > > co-exist with the fbdev driver. Which usually requested these > > > resources. > > > > > > But makes me wonder why the pci subsystem doesn't just request > > > resource automatically when we map a bar and a pci driver is bound? > > > > > > Knowledge about which pci bars we need kludged together from > > > intel_uncore.c and intel_gtt.c from i915 and intel-gtt.c over in th= e > > > fake agp driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe > > > Cc: Kees Cook > > > Cc: Dan Williams > > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > > Cc: John Hubbard > > > Cc: J=E9r=F4me Glisse > > > Cc: Jan Kara > > > Cc: Dan Williams > > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/= i915/intel_uncore.c > > > index 54e201fdeba4..ce39049d8919 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c > > > @@ -1692,10 +1692,13 @@ static int uncore_mmio_setup(struct intel_u= ncore *uncore) > > > struct pci_dev *pdev =3D i915->drm.pdev; > > > int mmio_bar; > > > int mmio_size; > > > + int bar_selection; > > > > Signed bitmasks always make me uneasy. But looks like > > that's what it is in the pci api. So meh. >=20 > Yeah it's surprising. >=20 > > > + int ret; > > > > > > mmio_bar =3D IS_GEN(i915, 2) ? 1 : 0; > > > + bar_selection =3D BIT (2) | BIT(mmio_bar); > > ^ > > spurious space > > > > That's also not correct for gen2 I think. > > > > gen2: > > 0 =3D GMADR > > 1 =3D MMADR > > 2 =3D IOBAR > > > > gen3: > > 0 =3D MMADR > > 1 =3D IOBAR > > 2 =3D GMADR > > 3 =3D GTTADR > > > > gen4+: > > 0+1 =3D GTTMMADR > > 2+3 =3D GMADR > > 4 =3D IOBAR > > > > Maybe we should just have an explicit list of bars like that in a > > comment? > > > > I'd also suggest sucking this bitmask calculation into a small helper > > so you can reuse it for the release. >=20 > tbh I just hacked this up for testing. Given how almost no other drm > driver does this, I'm wondering whether we should or not. >=20 > Also the only reason why I didn't just use the pci_request_regions > helper is to avoid the vga ioport range, since that's managed by > vgaarbiter. VGA io range isn't part of any bar. Or do you mean just the io decode enable bit in the pci command register? That should be just a matter or pci_enable_device() vs. pci_enable_device_mem() I think. So nothing to do with which bars we've requested IIRC. >=20 > So I think if we go for this for real we should: > - register the vga ioport range in the vgaarbiter > - have a pci_request_iomem_regions helper that grabs all mem bars > - roll that out to all drm pci drivers >=20 > Or something like that. The other complication is when we resize the > iobar. So not really sure what to do here. We resize it? --=20 Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 Intel