From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E38C4363D for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235622225D for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="j3fuCopb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 235622225D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BA2286B0099; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B51D76B009A; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:32:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9F3DE940007; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:32:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0071.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD976B0099 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A21180AD806 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:32:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77352626904.19.cave80_2501bcc271e1 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD23A1AD1AD for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:32:11 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: cave80_2501bcc271e1 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5666 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com (mail-qk1-f193.google.com [209.85.222.193]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id z6so10773179qkz.4 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:32:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=73DpVirPZ06c1n2mkJSkENlUc+TenafPYOh6N9YsRj8=; b=j3fuCopb7iniyL2y53HSklILSjdWqx7XXY5J7anSdWIzVAS51yHUg1bH+xWsQqV3an hVaIqQtPYG5XhAZxJubl7tnA+2dzIyrb1eABP/rsrrjt9Ddzi0d1WmSuwF0UQqwD1tgr 69SltM6wnxkhZu8y4olirPc3PCASUILXSC5ua6+ynVuzP7VwBBECaBlnoZLOtcJNGGyr NOkdDPv6Ux3fvUs6FlZoAKLjSdk3YJbxq2oDe3QQYv1fkcF15D+45H8TBvKAbi8SeVAg F1hEOalHcniDpc4tE9aqUhgdNW4MqmHYSXYkxAhz5TsGfdhszvZtn/5ZEIEGhUQjLvR4 psaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=73DpVirPZ06c1n2mkJSkENlUc+TenafPYOh6N9YsRj8=; b=ExuXIHDxMnQL8sbL1XU23NFWCLgsRZjHKZ8xjqya8LuO9h0jEdE7aC5lSWATzX5Kgu ZlBIVeTffV0viNcjsLW+bUU1XZ6580eJ9jyQhWenDVj/vzYw96v2Ocr83/negiV9nz/M GvKNK0Aei/A7gOSrHDHCA+zq2hMQDdASumNwujM3SZ9AGPXAtwetPCV4OtLbZNOy5wXo M2XoCXjnx/48eacU1+6Wa5xvT2RXNbkwNt5mdepRzq98dIZi+vXK4EzYZbKWs6g1F03H vC5GsEVuvW6Hw5+MBEFT8NTLpo1/3tQZQKS/jkUdD4qj/pUVBCoahU5OvR0QMmgJyiE7 5dmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M+e9i6JUJIHatYExtn45AR9o/GIma8vsF1E0BMTMgfYDxu2pc uHkX+oYL5yrMt2Un417Od8/bqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpwYy/97Cu1hz1/nj4gs64VmTlSZ35zli/9trR97tocuoZHHYGhTwRETY7JpaxNsFSCH9jrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:4d95:: with SMTP id a143mr13781409qkb.248.1602253930622; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-48-30.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.48.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r64sm6400897qkf.119.2020.10.09.07.32.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kQtRJ-001zsY-G1; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:32:09 -0300 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:32:09 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Daniel Vetter Cc: DRI Development , LKML , KVM list , Linux MM , Linux ARM , linux-samsung-soc , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , linux-s390 , Daniel Vetter , Kees Cook , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Jan Kara , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Hildenbrand , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/17] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework Message-ID: <20201009143209.GS5177@ziepe.ca> References: <20201009075934.3509076-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201009075934.3509076-15-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201009123109.GO5177@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:24:45PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:31 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:59:31AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > +struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void) > > > +{ > > > + return iomem_inode->i_mapping; > > > > This should pair an acquire with the release below > > > > > + /* > > > + * Publish /dev/mem initialized. > > > + * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem(). > > > + */ > > > + smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode); > > > > However, this seems abnormal, initcalls rarely do this kind of stuff > > with global data.. > > > > The kernel crashes if this fs_initcall is raced with > > iomem_get_mapping() due to the unconditional dereference, so I think > > it can be safely switched to a simple assignment. > > Ah yes I checked this all, but forgot to correctly annotate the > iomem_get_mapping access. For reference, see b34e7e298d7a ("/dev/mem: > Add missing memory barriers for devmem_inode"). Oh yikes, so revoke_iomem can run concurrently during early boot, tricky. > The reasons for the annotations is that iomem requests can happen > fairly early, way before fs_initcalls happen. That means revoke_iomem > needs to check for that and bail out if we race - nothing bad can > happen since userspace isn't running at this point anyway. And > apparently it needs to be a full acquire fence since we don't just > write a value, but need a barrier for the struct stuff. Yes, if that is what is happening it release/acquire is needed. Jason