From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B653CC5517A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD6E223AB for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:12:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AAD6E223AB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C98B76B006C; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:12:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C466C6B006E; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:12:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B35E96B0070; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:12:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0218.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.218]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882D86B006C for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 05:12:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC25180AD811 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:12:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77413509726.02.park47_331400627272 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB3D10097AA1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:12:03 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: park47_331400627272 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3479 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:12:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519D9AC35; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F37711E0EAA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:11:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:11:55 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jan Kara , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , William Kucharski , Johannes Weiner , Yang Shi , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] mm/filemap: Return only head pages from find_get_entries Message-ID: <20201026091155.GB28769@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20200914130042.11442-1-willy@infradead.org> <20200914130042.11442-13-willy@infradead.org> <20200930121512.GT10896@quack2.suse.cz> <20200930123637.GP20115@casper.infradead.org> <20200930170807.GA15977@quack2.suse.cz> <20200930172321.GS20115@casper.infradead.org> <20201001071728.GA17860@quack2.suse.cz> <20201025231934.GL20115@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201025231934.GL20115@casper.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun 25-10-20 23:19:34, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:17:28AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > I have a followup patch which isn't part of this series which fixes it: > > > > > > http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/commitdiff/364283163847d1c106463223b858308c730592a1 > > > > Yeah, that looks good. How about partial THPs? The way you've implemented > > it we will now possibly evict more than strictly required. But OTOH > > evicting exactly may require THP split which is a bit unfortunate. But > > probably still a better option because otherwise we could have pages being > > repeatedly brought in and out of cache just because e.g. workload mixes > > direct and buffered IO and is not aligned to THP boundary (and although I > > find loads mixing buffered and direct IO to the same file badly designed, > > I know for a fact that they do exist and if the file ranges are not > > overlapping, it is not that insane design). > > Sorry, forgot to reply to this. > > In this patchset, THPs are created by readahead. We always start > out by allocating order-0 pages and only ramp up after hitting a page > marked as PageReadahead. So it's not like tmpfs where we'll try to jump > straight to order-9 pages and have to worry about the behaviour you're > describing above. That means in this kind of scenario, we might have, > eg, an order-6 page in the cache, remove the whole thing, then bring > back in some order-0 pages. If we hit on those, we'll bring in some > order-2 pages. We won't bring in order-6 pages again until we've hit > in the readahead window twice more. > > I think the ramp-up is probably too aggressive, but it's fun for testing. OK, sounds good then. Thanks for explanation. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR