linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/29] virtio-mem: don't always trigger the workqueue when offlining memory
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:38:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112133815.13332-16-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112133815.13332-1-david@redhat.com>

Let's trigger from offlining code only when we're not allowed to unplug
online memory. Handle the other case (memmap possibly freeing up another
memory block) when actually removing memory. We now also properly handle
the case when removing already offline memory blocks via
virtio_mem_mb_remove(). When removing via virtio_mem_remove(), when
unloading the driver, virtio_mem_retry() is a NOP and safe to use.

While at it, move retry handling when offlining out of
virtio_mem_notify_offline(), to share it with Big Block Mode (BBM)
soon.

This is a preparation for Big Block Mode (BBM), whereby we can see some
temporary offlining of memory blocks without actually making progress.
Imagine you have a Big Block that spans to Linux memory blocks. Assume
the first Linux memory blocks has no unmovable data on it. When we would
call offline_and_remove_memory() on the big block, we would
	1. Try to offline the first block. Works, notifiers triggered.
	   virtio_mem_retry() called.
	2. Try to offline the second block. Does not work.
	3. Re-online first block.
	4. Exit to main loop, exit workqueue.
	5. Retry immediately (due to virtio_mem_retry()), go to 1.
The result are endless retries.

Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
index a7beac5942e0..f86654af8b6b 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static void virtio_mem_fake_offline_going_offline(unsigned long pfn,
 						  unsigned long nr_pages);
 static void virtio_mem_fake_offline_cancel_offline(unsigned long pfn,
 						   unsigned long nr_pages);
+static void virtio_mem_retry(struct virtio_mem *vm);
 
 /*
  * Register a virtio-mem device so it will be considered for the online_page
@@ -447,9 +448,17 @@ static int virtio_mem_mb_add(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id)
 static int virtio_mem_mb_remove(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id)
 {
 	const uint64_t addr = virtio_mem_mb_id_to_phys(mb_id);
+	int rc;
 
 	dev_dbg(&vm->vdev->dev, "removing memory block: %lu\n", mb_id);
-	return remove_memory(vm->nid, addr, memory_block_size_bytes());
+	rc = remove_memory(vm->nid, addr, memory_block_size_bytes());
+	if (!rc)
+		/*
+		 * We might have freed up memory we can now unplug, retry
+		 * immediately instead of waiting.
+		 */
+		virtio_mem_retry(vm);
+	return rc;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -464,11 +473,19 @@ static int virtio_mem_mb_offline_and_remove(struct virtio_mem *vm,
 					    unsigned long mb_id)
 {
 	const uint64_t addr = virtio_mem_mb_id_to_phys(mb_id);
+	int rc;
 
 	dev_dbg(&vm->vdev->dev, "offlining and removing memory block: %lu\n",
 		mb_id);
-	return offline_and_remove_memory(vm->nid, addr,
-					 memory_block_size_bytes());
+	rc = offline_and_remove_memory(vm->nid, addr,
+				       memory_block_size_bytes());
+	if (!rc)
+		/*
+		 * We might have freed up memory we can now unplug, retry
+		 * immediately instead of waiting.
+		 */
+		virtio_mem_retry(vm);
+	return rc;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -546,15 +563,6 @@ static void virtio_mem_notify_offline(struct virtio_mem *vm,
 		BUG();
 		break;
 	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Trigger the workqueue, maybe we can now unplug memory. Also,
-	 * when we offline and remove a memory block, this will re-trigger
-	 * us immediately - which is often nice because the removal of
-	 * the memory block (e.g., memmap) might have freed up memory
-	 * on other memory blocks we manage.
-	 */
-	virtio_mem_retry(vm);
 }
 
 static void virtio_mem_notify_online(struct virtio_mem *vm, unsigned long mb_id)
@@ -672,6 +680,14 @@ static int virtio_mem_memory_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		break;
 	case MEM_OFFLINE:
 		virtio_mem_notify_offline(vm, mb_id);
+
+		/*
+		 * Trigger the workqueue. Now that we have some offline memory,
+		 * maybe we can handle pending unplug requests.
+		 */
+		if (!unplug_online)
+			virtio_mem_retry(vm);
+
 		vm->hotplug_active = false;
 		mutex_unlock(&vm->hotplug_mutex);
 		break;
-- 
2.26.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-12 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-12 13:37 [PATCH v2 00/29] virtio-mem: Big Block Mode (BBM) David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/29] virtio-mem: determine nid only once using memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/29] virtio-mem: more precise calculation in virtio_mem_mb_state_prepare_next_mb() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/29] virtio-mem: simplify MAX_ORDER - 1 / pageblock_order handling David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/29] virtio-mem: drop rc2 in virtio_mem_mb_plug_and_add() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/29] virtio-mem: use "unsigned long" for nr_pages when fake onlining/offlining David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/29] virtio-mem: factor out calculation of the bit number within the subblock bitmap David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/29] virtio-mem: print debug messages from virtio_mem_send_*_request() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/29] virtio-mem: factor out fake-offlining into virtio_mem_fake_offline() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/29] virtio-mem: factor out handling of fake-offline pages in memory notifier David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/29] virtio-mem: retry fake-offlining via alloc_contig_range() on ZONE_MOVABLE David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/29] virtio-mem: generalize check for added memory David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/29] virtio-mem: generalize virtio_mem_owned_mb() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 13/29] virtio-mem: generalize virtio_mem_overlaps_range() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/29] virtio-mem: drop last_mb_id David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/29] virtio-mem: generalize handling when memory is getting onlined deferred David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 17/29] virito-mem: document Sub Block Mode (SBM) David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 18/29] virtio-mem: memory block states are specific to " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 19/29] virito-mem: subblock " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 20/29] virtio-mem: nb_sb_per_mb and subblock_size " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 21/29] virtio-mem: memory block ids " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 22/29] virito-mem: existing (un)plug functions " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 23/29] virtio-mem: memory notifier callbacks " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 24/29] virtio-mem: factor out adding/removing memory from Linux David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 25/29] virtio-mem: Big Block Mode (BBM) memory hotplug David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 26/29] virtio-mem: allow to force Big Block Mode (BBM) and set the big block size David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 27/29] mm/memory_hotplug: extend offline_and_remove_memory() to handle more than one memory block David Hildenbrand
2020-11-18  4:53   ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-18  8:59     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 28/29] virtio-mem: Big Block Mode (BBM) - basic memory hotunplug David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 29/29] virtio-mem: Big Block Mode (BBM) - safe " David Hildenbrand
2020-11-18  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/29] virtio-mem: Big Block Mode (BBM) Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201112133815.13332-16-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).