From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:42:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201117034220.GA109785@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117025529.1034387-1-guro@fb.com>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:54:55PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Currently bpf is using the memlock rlimit for the memory accounting.
> This approach has its downsides and over time has created a significant
> amount of problems:
>
I'm sorry, I've missed the "bpf-next" prefix in the subject.
Resending.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-17 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 2:54 [PATCH v6 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:54 ` [PATCH v6 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:54 ` [PATCH v6 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:54 ` [PATCH v6 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:54 ` [PATCH v6 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 2:55 ` [PATCH v6 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-11-17 3:42 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201117034220.GA109785@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).