On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:41:57PM +0000, Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > > From: Uwe Kleine-König > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pwm: keembay: Fix build failure with -Os > > > > [Cc: += linux-pwm which I forgot for the initial submission] > > > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > The driver used this construct: > > > > > > #define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_MASK GENMASK(30, 0) > > > > > > static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm > > *priv, u32 mask, > > > u32 val, u32 offset) > > > { > > > u32 buff = readl(priv->base + offset); > > > > > > buff = u32_replace_bits(buff, val, mask); > > > writel(buff, priv->base + offset); > > > } > > > > > > ... > > > keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_LEADIN_MASK, 0, > > > KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(pwm- > > >hwpwm)); > > > > > > With CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE the compiler (here: gcc 10.2.0) this > > > triggers: > > > > > > In file included from /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/drivers/pwm/pwm- > > keembay.c:16: > > > In function ‘field_multiplier’, > > > inlined from ‘keembay_pwm_update_bits’ at > > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:124:17: > > > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:119:3: error: call to > > ‘__bad_mask’ declared with attribute error: bad bitfield mask > > > 119 | __bad_mask(); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > In function ‘field_multiplier’, > > > inlined from ‘keembay_pwm_update_bits’ at > > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:154:1: > > > /home/uwe/gsrc/linux/include/linux/bitfield.h:119:3: error: call to > > ‘__bad_mask’ declared with attribute error: bad bitfield mask > > > 119 | __bad_mask(); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > The compiler doesn't seem to be able to notice that with field being > > > 0x3ffffff the expression > > > > > > if ((field | (field - 1)) & ((field | (field - 1)) + 1)) > > > __bad_mask(); > > > > > > can be optimized away. > > > > > > So use __always_inline and document the problem in a comment to fix > > > this. > > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > > --- > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm not sure this is the right fix. Maybe the bitfield stuff can be > > > changed somehow to make this problem go away, too? > > > > Note, this patch > > > > Fixes: cdbea243f419 ("pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay") > > > > so this isn't critical for v5.10. > > > > @thierry: If this is ok for you and Vijayakannan, you can squash this > > into the original commit. > > > > I am ok with Uwe approach. > I have compiled the change and tested in Keembay board as well. I'll take that as a Tested-by. Next time, if you go through the trouble of testing a patch, make sure to reply with a: Tested-by: Your Name So that patchwork can pick that up and credit you for it. Thierry