From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95722C6369E for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D133E241A6 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="owzVPshz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D133E241A6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 423936B0068; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:14:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 3FC8A6B006C; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:14:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 29E766B0070; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:14:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0133.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.133]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DEF6B0068 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:14:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C293180AD807 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77501513502.01.color95_281747227343 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BF010050033 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:11 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: color95_281747227343 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 14577 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-104-11.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.104.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E78922202; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605798849; bh=O0F77QORdyXIOJ8KhKLqKUGe5MOFzgcomRJIXAE1PzU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=owzVPshzbN5pfQpIxJqX/8Pilxys5Ch4xqLCORBsfx6GgcovXoctWIZNKJ687Y0Il EtybIbBaHu5XmbfnFqPTQRgRIyOxoALkpvJHC0qodKa6WSdTVa1I5KnSmISXWTwcyF zK5SqJAwtpPRkdDQj8BESX7+5JsoqUeQE0FPFgOU= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A16435225C9; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:14:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:14:09 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Marco Elver Cc: Steven Rostedt , Anders Roxell , Andrew Morton , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Jann Horn , Mark Rutland , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , kasan-dev , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfence: Avoid stalling work queue task without allocations Message-ID: <20201119151409.GU1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20201112001129.GD3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201112161439.GA2989297@elver.google.com> <20201112175406.GF3249@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201113175754.GA6273@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201117105236.GA1964407@elver.google.com> <20201117182915.GM1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201118225621.GA1770130@elver.google.com> <20201118233841.GS1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201119125357.GA2084963@elver.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201119125357.GA2084963@elver.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 01:53:57PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:38PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:56:21PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > > > [...] > > > I think I figured out one piece of the puzzle. Bisection keeps pointing > > > me at some -rcu merge commit, which kept throwing me off. Nor did it > > > help that reproduction is a bit flaky. However, I think there are 2 > > > independent problems, but the manifestation of 1 problem triggers the > > > 2nd problem: > > > > > > 1. problem: slowed forward progress (workqueue lockup / RCU stall reports) > > > > > > 2. problem: DEADLOCK which causes complete system lockup > > > > > > | ... > > > | CPU0 > > > | ---- > > > | lock(rcu_node_0); > > > | > > > | lock(rcu_node_0); > > > | > > > | *** DEADLOCK *** > > > | > > > | 1 lock held by event_benchmark/105: > > > | #0: ffffbb6e0b804458 (rcu_node_0){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: print_other_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:493 [inline] > > > | #0: ffffbb6e0b804458 (rcu_node_0){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: check_cpu_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:652 [inline] > > > | #0: ffffbb6e0b804458 (rcu_node_0){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: rcu_pending kernel/rcu/tree.c:3752 [inline] > > > | #0: ffffbb6e0b804458 (rcu_node_0){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: rcu_sched_clock_irq+0x428/0xd40 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2581 > > > | ... > > > > > > Problem 2 can with reasonable confidence (5 trials) be fixed by reverting: > > > > > > rcu: Don't invoke try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() with irqs disabled > > > > > > At which point the system always boots to user space -- albeit with a > > > bunch of warnings still (attached). The supposed "good" version doesn't > > > end up with all those warnings deterministically, so I couldn't say if > > > the warnings are expected due to recent changes or not (Arm64 QEMU > > > emulation, 1 CPU, and lots of debugging tools on). > > > > > > Does any of that make sense? > > > > Marco, it makes all too much sense! :-/ > > > > Does the patch below help? > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > commit 444ef3bbd0f243b912fdfd51f326704f8ee872bf > > Author: Peter Zijlstra > > Date: Sat Aug 29 10:22:24 2020 -0700 > > > > sched/core: Allow try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() with irqs disabled > > My assumption is that this is a replacement for "rcu: Don't invoke > try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() with irqs disabled", right? Hmmm... It was actually intended to be in addition. > That seems to have the same result (same test setup) as only reverting > "rcu: Don't invoke..." does: still results in a bunch of workqueue > lockup warnings and RCU stall warnings, but boots to user space. I > attached a log. If the warnings are expected (are they?), then it looks > fine to me. No, they are not at all expected, but might be a different symptom of the original problem. Please see below. > (And just in case: with "rcu: Don't invoke..." and "sched/core: > Allow..." both applied I still get DEADLOCKs -- but that's probably > expected.) As noted earlier, it is a surprise. Could you please send me the console output? > Thanks, > -- Marco > Testing all events: OK > hrtimer: interrupt took 17120368 ns > Running tests again, along with the function tracer > Running tests on all trace events: > Testing all events: > BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 12s! > Showing busy workqueues and worker pools: > workqueue events: flags=0x0 > pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2 > pending: vmstat_shepherd > BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 17s! > Showing busy workqueues and worker pools: > workqueue events: flags=0x0 > pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2 > pending: vmstat_shepherd > workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x82 > pwq 2: cpus=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=3 > pending: neigh_periodic_work > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:758 rcu_check_gp_start_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:750 [inline] > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:758 rcu_check_gp_start_stall.isra.0+0x14c/0x210 kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:711 I have different line numbering, but the only warning that I see in this function is the one complaining that RCU has been ignoring a request to start a grace period for too long. This usually happens because the RCU grace-period kthread (named "rcu_preempt" in your case, but can also be named "rcu_sched") is being prevented from running, but can be caused by other things as well. > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc3-next-20201110-00003-g920304642405-dirty #30 > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) > pstate: 20000085 (nzCv daIf -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) > pc : rcu_check_gp_start_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:750 [inline] > pc : rcu_check_gp_start_stall.isra.0+0x14c/0x210 kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:711 > lr : __xchg_mb arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:88 [inline] > lr : atomic_xchg include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:615 [inline] > lr : rcu_check_gp_start_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:751 [inline] > lr : rcu_check_gp_start_stall.isra.0+0x148/0x210 kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:711 Two program counters and four link registers? Awesome! ;-) > sp : ffff800010003d20 > x29: ffff800010003d20 x28: ffff274ac3a10000 > x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffff274b3dbe72d8 > x25: ffffbcb867722000 x24: 0000000000000000 > x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffbcb8681d1260 > x21: ffffbcb86735b000 x20: ffffbcb867404440 > x19: ffffbcb867404440 x18: 0000000000000123 > x17: ffffbcb865d400f0 x16: 0000000000000002 > x15: 0000000000000002 x14: 0000000000000000 > x13: 003d090000000000 x12: 00001e8480000000 > x11: ffffbcb867958980 x10: ffff800010003cf0 > x9 : ffffbcb864f4b7c8 x8 : 0000000000000080 > x7 : 0000000000000026 x6 : ffffbcb86774e4c0 > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 00000000d4001f4b > x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 > x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : 0000000000000000 > Call trace: > rcu_check_gp_start_stall kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:750 [inline] > rcu_check_gp_start_stall.isra.0+0x14c/0x210 kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:711 > rcu_core+0x168/0x9e0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2719 > rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2737 The RCU_SOFTIRQ handler is causing this checking to occur, for whatever that is worth. > __do_softirq+0x188/0x6b4 kernel/softirq.c:298 > do_softirq_own_stack include/linux/interrupt.h:568 [inline] > invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:393 [inline] > __irq_exit_rcu kernel/softirq.c:423 [inline] > irq_exit+0x1cc/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:447 > __handle_domain_irq+0xb4/0x130 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:690 > handle_domain_irq include/linux/irqdesc.h:170 [inline] > gic_handle_irq+0x70/0x108 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c:370 > el1_irq+0xc0/0x180 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:651 > arch_local_irq_restore+0x8/0x10 arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:124 > release_probes kernel/tracepoint.c:113 [inline] > tracepoint_remove_func kernel/tracepoint.c:315 [inline] > tracepoint_probe_unregister+0x220/0x378 kernel/tracepoint.c:382 > trace_event_reg+0x58/0x150 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:298 > __ftrace_event_enable_disable+0x424/0x608 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:412 > ftrace_event_enable_disable kernel/trace/trace_events.c:495 [inline] > __ftrace_set_clr_event_nolock+0x120/0x180 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:811 > __ftrace_set_clr_event+0x60/0x90 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:833 > event_trace_self_tests+0xd4/0x114 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:3661 > event_trace_self_test_with_function kernel/trace/trace_events.c:3734 [inline] > event_trace_self_tests_init+0x88/0xa8 kernel/trace/trace_events.c:3747 > do_one_initcall+0xa4/0x500 init/main.c:1212 > do_initcall_level init/main.c:1285 [inline] > do_initcalls init/main.c:1301 [inline] > do_basic_setup init/main.c:1321 [inline] > kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x3c4 init/main.c:1521 > kernel_init+0x20/0x16c init/main.c:1410 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:961 > irq event stamp: 3274113 > hardirqs last enabled at (3274112): [] rcu_core+0x974/0x9e0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2716 > hardirqs last disabled at (3274113): [] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline] > hardirqs last disabled at (3274113): [] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb8/0x14c kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159 > softirqs last enabled at (3272576): [] __do_softirq+0x630/0x6b4 kernel/softirq.c:325 > softirqs last disabled at (3274101): [] do_softirq_own_stack include/linux/interrupt.h:568 [inline] > softirqs last disabled at (3274101): [] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:393 [inline] > softirqs last disabled at (3274101): [] __irq_exit_rcu kernel/softirq.c:423 [inline] > softirqs last disabled at (3274101): [] irq_exit+0x1cc/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:447 > ---[ end trace 902768efebf5a607 ]--- > rcu: rcu_preempt: wait state: RCU_GP_WAIT_GPS(1) ->state: 0x0 delta ->gp_activity 4452 ->gp_req_activity 3848 ->gp_wake_time 3848 ->gp_wake_seq 2696 ->gp_seq 2696 ->gp_seq_needed 2700 ->gp_flags 0x1 The last thing that RCU's grace-period kthread did was to go to sleep waiting for a grace-period request (RCU_GP_WAIT_GPS). > rcu: rcu_node 0:0 ->gp_seq 2696 ->gp_seq_needed 2700 > rcu: RCU callbacks invoked since boot: 2583 > rcu_tasks: RTGS_WAIT_CBS(11) since 567120 g:1 i:0/0 k. > rcu_tasks_rude: RTGS_WAIT_CBS(11) since 567155 g:1 i:0/1 k. > rcu_tasks_trace: RTGS_INIT(0) since 4295464549 g:0 i:0/0 k. N0 h:0/0/0 > rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: > (detected by 0, t=3752 jiffies, g=2705, q=8) > rcu: All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 557 (4295471128-4295470571), jiffies_till_next_fqs=1, root ->qsmask 0x0 > rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 557 jiffies! g2705 f0x2 RCU_GP_CLEANUP(7) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0 And here we see that RCU's grace-period kthread has in fact been starved. This kthread is now in RCU_GP_CLEANUP, perhaps because of the wakeup that is sent in rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(). My current guess is that this is a consequence of the earlier failures, but who knows? Thanx, Paul > rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. > rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: > task:rcu_preempt state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 10 ppid: 2 flags:0x00000428 > Call trace: > __switch_to+0x10c/0x200 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c:578 > context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:3772 [inline] > __schedule+0x2d8/0x980 kernel/sched/core.c:4521 > preempt_schedule_common+0x4c/0x1a8 kernel/sched/core.c:4680 > preempt_schedule+0x38/0x40 kernel/sched/core.c:4705 > __raw_spin_unlock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:169 [inline] > _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x84/0x98 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:199 > rcu_gp_cleanup kernel/rcu/tree.c:2015 [inline] > rcu_gp_kthread+0x1038/0x1bd8 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2119 > kthread+0x13c/0x188 kernel/kthread.c:292 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:961 > OK > Testing ftrace filter: OK > Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates > input: gpio-keys as /devices/platform/gpio-keys/input/input0 > ALSA device list: > No soundcards found. > TAP version 14 > 1..0 > uart-pl011 9000000.pl011: no DMA platform data > EXT4-fs (sda): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem > EXT4-fs (sda): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly on device 8:0. > devtmpfs: mounted > Freeing unused kernel memory: 8832K > Run /sbin/init as init process