From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C86C63777 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790CB2245B for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 790CB2245B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D816C6B0071; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D09B86B0073; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:02:20 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B82D06B0074; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:02:20 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0223.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.223]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885606B0071 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66E3644 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77505566040.03.birth22_26037fb2734d Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80DC1A351 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:13 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: birth22_26037fb2734d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4951 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483481042; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:02:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.27.176]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBCEC3F719; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:02:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:02:06 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Marco Elver , Steven Rostedt , Anders Roxell , Andrew Morton , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Jann Horn , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , kasan-dev , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: linux-next: stall warnings and deadlock on Arm64 (was: [PATCH] kfence: Avoid stalling...) Message-ID: <20201120180206.GF2328@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <20201119125357.GA2084963@elver.google.com> <20201119151409.GU1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201119170259.GA2134472@elver.google.com> <20201119184854.GY1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201119193819.GA2601289@elver.google.com> <20201119213512.GB1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201120141928.GB3120165@elver.google.com> <20201120143928.GH1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201120152200.GD2328@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20201120173824.GJ1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201120173824.GJ1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:38:24AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:22:00PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:39:28AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:19:28PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > > > > I found that disabling ftrace for some of kernel/rcu (see below) solved > > > > the stalls (and any mention of deadlocks as a side-effect I assume), > > > > resulting in successful boot. > > > > > > > > Does that provide any additional clues? I tried to narrow it down to 1-2 > > > > files, but that doesn't seem to work. > > > > > > There were similar issues during the x86/entry work. Are the ARM guys > > > doing arm64/entry work now? > > > > I'm currently looking at it. I had been trying to shift things to C for > > a while, and right now I'm trying to fix the lockdep state tracking, > > which is requiring untangling lockdep/rcu/tracing. > > > > The main issue I see remaining atm is that we don't save/restore the > > lockdep state over exceptions taken from kernel to kernel. That could > > result in lockdep thinking IRQs are disabled when they're actually > > enabled (because code in the nested context might do a save/restore > > while IRQs are disabled, then return to a context where IRQs are > > enabled), but AFAICT shouldn't result in the inverse in most cases since > > the non-NMI handlers all call lockdep_hardirqs_disabled(). > > > > I'm at a loss to explaim the rcu vs ftrace bits, so if you have any > > pointers to the issuies ween with the x86 rework that'd be quite handy. > > There were several over a number of months. I especially recall issues > with the direct-from-idle execution of smp_call_function*() handlers, > and also with some of the special cases in the entry code, for example, > reentering the kernel from the kernel. This latter could cause RCU to > not be watching when it should have been or vice versa. Ah; those are precisely the cases I'm currently fixing, so if we're lucky this is an indirect result of one of those rather than a novel source of pain... > I would of course be most aware of the issues that impinged on RCU > and that were located by rcutorture. This is actually not hard to run, > especially if the ARM bits in the scripting have managed to avoid bitrot. > The "modprobe rcutorture" approach has fewer dependencies. Either way: > https://paulmck.livejournal.com/57769.html and later posts. That is a very good idea. I'd been relying on Syzkaller to tickle the issue, but the torture infrastructure is a much better fit for this problem. I hadn't realise how comprehensive the scripting was, thanks for this! I'll see about giving that a go once I have the irq-from-idle cases sorted, as those are very obviously broken if you hack trace_hardirqs_{on,off}() to check that RCU is watching. Thanks, Mark.