From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B610C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A0223A9B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:28:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D9A0223A9B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E30BB6B005C; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:28:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DE1EA6B005D; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:28:49 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CD0606B0068; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:28:49 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0209.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.209]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37966B005C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:28:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DA48249980 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:28:49 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77570043978.08.sign26_1c17ad9273e7 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FD41819E76B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:28:49 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: sign26_1c17ad9273e7 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5687 Received: from mail-ua1-f66.google.com (mail-ua1-f66.google.com [209.85.222.66]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua1-f66.google.com with SMTP id t15so5545770ual.6 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 04:28:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ggW586a4wUXgxsMLIE+kWjuZOeFFSfzFi9tuTrNvuLA=; b=mXihHLRx+k1GUWlpHXN+BctZxk/fxPMq7eOdtSSe4QsgFqcrNtDlnPFq896ihJahxa 1jLb1Y63s9RYJeqOBdDzwxGddSdL0oaWFHJUlVSnL7YIM0QZIV/n+fNkHzeTmSn0TlYV HeSM8DwNCuTinmzF+YEFnySuMtPlbOt/xzWdnX9F9LZGClzdTcbWNcrKkohGxkoT3HX7 tUWtiMDIGf6DuIz2VBNAD983pD+N5h25gCDliJwXooJz2EKwqLq6G9TO1IEiiK52VLwG FF2g7grvKvIlFNIMWa+wQ9vUocC3jfXT9KC0AnYryum6QuJfVMbQpTPujGNtADbld5k+ p+RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ggW586a4wUXgxsMLIE+kWjuZOeFFSfzFi9tuTrNvuLA=; b=B7UK8Vo1MdecFKNDU87EDlg4uuQDMkjVrqrjj/gLBLZtoIn/iN6hVxrj+9Ydv1Pc4u EYYBjIqEexLZZlHJv9VT59wGip2iVLsvBxPkDPPRzWTIIqjqLwxCrps1/kwDa5wQciqI yscT8AayYpZd8DrzbGkxObrudFBB8FPXEyk8xI2z5Tbw+XNVfO4M4JnE4WpVsxoif10m eqpHzQhB0ENk6pQuEwr6CLkL7pjAh0wRTXhCVSwZ7o+OpGqwPflyvoEVW2gnTUvBqy1P Y7sLCmMamdzT9LGYcLvNKNtk3Z6wLHR7QzyKVw1/VpeX1mn/WRjsjmkvKalBK03BcWhQ Uo+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+NyQpnL6lU4/ibtQsSdL5JqM0cjufEJHml2iLmSFXMQro8hPP 1PxN8avJ8wuHKIUEmCha2Xw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxuVcP3EAAfgDF0k0PlxjPW5b2sr3eVAqYL2ivJdprEi8LWozDz8k8uYq2GIccXIuIm4krlA== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:26a:: with SMTP id 97mr13411872uas.110.1607430528055; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 04:28:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.236.19.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w202sm2001106vkd.25.2020.12.08.04.28.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 04:28:47 -0800 (PST) From: Yafang Shao To: darrick.wong@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@redhat.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Yafang Shao Subject: [PATCH v11 0/4] xfs: avoid transaction reservation recursion Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:28:20 +0800 Message-Id: <20201208122824.16118-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.3 (Apple Git-128) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: PF_FSTRANS which is used to avoid transaction reservation recursion, is dropped since commit 9070733b4efa ("xfs: abstract PF_FSTRANS to PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS") and commit 7dea19f9ee63 ("mm: introduce memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} API"), and replaced by PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS whic= h means to avoid filesystem reclaim recursion. As these two flags have different meanings, we'd better reintroduce PF_FSTRANS back. To avoid wasting the space of PF_* flags in task_struct, we can reuse the current->journal_info to do that, per Willy. As the=20 check of transaction reservation recursion is used by XFS only, we can=20 move the check into xfs_vm_writepage(s), per Dave. Patch #1 and #2 are to use the memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} API Patch #1 is picked form Willy's patchset "Overhaul memalloc_no*"[1] Patch #3 is the refactor of xfs_trans context, which is activated when xfs_trans is allocated and deactivated when xfs_trans is freed. Patch #4 is the implementation of reussing current->journal_info to avoid transaction reservation recursion. No obvious error occurred after running xfstests. [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200625113122.7540-1-willy@infrade= ad.org v11: - add the warning at the callsite of xfs_trans_context_active() - improve the commit log of patch #2 v10: - refactor the code, per Dave. v9: - rebase it on xfs tree. - Darrick fixed an error occurred in xfs/141 - run xfstests, and no obvious error occurred. v8: - check xfs_trans_context_active() in xfs_vm_writepage(s), per Dave. v7: - check fstrans recursion for XFS only, by introducing a new member in struct writeback_control. v6: - add Michal's ack and comment in patch #1.=20 v5: - pick one of Willy's patch - introduce four new helpers, per Dave v4: - retitle from "xfs: introduce task->in_fstrans for transaction reservati= on recursion protection" - reuse current->journal_info, per Willy Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) (1): mm: Add become_kswapd and restore_kswapd Yafang Shao (3): xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} in xfs transaction xfs: refactor the usage around xfs_trans_context_{set,clear} xfs: use current->journal_info to avoid transaction reservation recursion fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 7 ------- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 14 ++++++++------ fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h | 4 ---- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/sched/mm.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 16 +--------------- 8 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) --=20 2.18.4