From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839E7C4167B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253DF23B08 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 253DF23B08 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 60B626B005C; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:22:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5BC3C6B005D; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:22:56 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4D2166B006C; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:22:56 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0165.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.165]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F546B005C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:22:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3463625 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77570785110.29.alarm54_1c0ba2f273e8 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A97180868CA for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:55 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: alarm54_1c0ba2f273e8 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2974 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:54 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: 8RCmsrq8qK67iYV+mY8e1a/prtxza90/YbABZ0H/jYpY7M38hu6loE1nvPhU5WyLtHBvshVsix 9ovpKZSzlwWg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9829"; a="171360375" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,403,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="171360375" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 4tMCT8vGceU6karZIafhKmMgXOvVyLb2LYUpW4elgkPoxwOmo0p3IPPIPJd/KFUP4xOgwuEKcz tsRuwAPBPm3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,403,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="363733327" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 From: Ira Weiny To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 Message-ID: <20201208172250.GA2032506@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20201106232908.364581-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Ira, > > On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 14:14, Ira Weiny wrote: > > Is there any chance of this landing before the kmap stuff gets sorted out? > > I have marked this as needs an update because the change log of 5/10 > sucks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lff1xcmv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > > > It would be nice to have this in 5.11 to build off of. > > It would be nice if people follow up on review request :) I did, but just as an update to that patch.[1] Sorry if this caused you to miss the response. It would have been better for me to ping you on that patch. :-/ I was trying to avoid a whole new series just for that single commit message. Is that generally ok? Is that commit message still lacking? Ira [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20201124060956.1405768-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/