From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CE1C433E0 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FAB23133 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:41:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 73FAB23133 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0995D8D0129; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 03:41:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 048B88D011F; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 03:41:48 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id EC7FF8D0129; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 03:41:48 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0153.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.153]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5A8D011F for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 03:41:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A443F180AD801 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:41:48 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77678335896.20.mark83_2a074a4274e8 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826C180C07A3 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:41:48 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: mark83_2a074a4274e8 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4135 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:41:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1610008907; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qNrl7v2LA8BGeKk2+aA7m+tjG5vBycGS+SxdKiGLD1A=; b=ATeUqQBfynrP+ubx1EB95++YKysYFWqeb9rRK9U5lmfref1hLBc98niIT5Qo0RH7rRg5RE FKe6RQiZMNAKAWUQGj9ZXwvT1/ZDWJQfPoZsTcjzzLm0IzUqivyReNTErYHoH3/WqVssG4 f7xP0bHcaBVIpuKpAZPEbFKC0JsVGaM= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E574AD26; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:41:46 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Muchun Song Cc: Mike Kravetz , Andrew Morton , Naoya Horiguchi , Andi Kleen , Linux Memory Management List , LKML Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the page Message-ID: <20210107084146.GD13207@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20210106084739.63318-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> <20210106084739.63318-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com> <20210106165632.GT13207@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 07-01-21 13:39:38, Muchun Song wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:56 AM Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Wed 06-01-21 16:47:36, Muchun Song wrote: > > > There is a race condition between __free_huge_page() > > > and dissolve_free_huge_page(). > > > > > > CPU0: CPU1: > > > > > > // page_count(page) == 1 > > > put_page(page) > > > __free_huge_page(page) > > > dissolve_free_huge_page(page) > > > spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) > > > // PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page) > > > update_and_free_page(page) > > > // page is freed to the buddy > > > spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) > > > spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock) > > > clear_page_huge_active(page) > > > enqueue_huge_page(page) > > > // It is wrong, the page is already freed > > > spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock) > > > > > > The race windows is between put_page() and spin_lock() which > > > is in the __free_huge_page(). > > > > The race window reall is between put_page and dissolve_free_huge_page. > > And the result is that the put_page path would clobber an unrelated page > > (either free or already reused page) which is quite serious. > > Fortunatelly pages are dissolved very rarely. I believe that user would > > require to be privileged to hit this by intention. > > > > > We should make sure that the page is already on the free list > > > when it is dissolved. > > > > Another option would be to check for PageHuge in __free_huge_page. Have > > you considered that rather than add yet another state? The scope of the > > spinlock would have to be extended. If that sounds more tricky then can > > we check the page->lru in the dissolve path? If the page is still > > PageHuge and reference count 0 then there shouldn't be many options > > where it can be queued, right? > > Did you mean that we iterate over the free list to check whether > the page is on the free list? No I meant to check that the page is enqueued which along with ref count = 0 should mean it has been released to the pool unless I am missing something. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs