From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87282C433E0 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B2922473 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:24:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 01B2922473 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shutemov.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 316D98D0030; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:24:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2C73A8D0020; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:24:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1B7698D0030; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:24:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0159.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.159]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0486A8D0020 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:24:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBA8181AEF00 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:23:59 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77693713398.24.food71_50083e62750d Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7711A4A5 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:23:59 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: food71_50083e62750d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4102 Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id o10so27050338lfl.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:23:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=AUnHjmoZBMPPrCWzaTempqIXz+G+HPhuggI2H5BxADg=; b=NYTw7WWk1Zf7aSea06TGNnxIUYEc7qq9AW/lldbVIlJWFwcFfjUZfoog7LIDmbomQT 4Ji/pCiUBy/Pvci3hJLsfml51b/4OYHgCYH4usuGLc9BYLPBS8Y+4CYEzlI+KLerC4mo euxtuBpAYikzhBtptV3Xzt0M8bEon0shmqoSYFufDnj8HNvqVXDrVTpmig6MMDU8p2jx 25RftUJXI7+SCtdFIWtP4yxlAtQoYFXLf8D+XQUUs5oU1AuI7YWugV2r114YA9HR46kM cf7/Xcv8oKNI1EpyOw6GOwJwUXCAvwi6v0reLfn4RacXEr4OCuBK5zxbX6JYIJSbxoza +lFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=AUnHjmoZBMPPrCWzaTempqIXz+G+HPhuggI2H5BxADg=; b=kfuulf7wmKnt29Fxkpm9+tAZZ6DcxtozFR2EfgRYiEOyslT5tJ18GbU3KAaqSFjkxR WZMy/v39cEszkTOkMWadDX3BhYAGbMIWJM1Zee+9NDgWi3LLBTV5eEO+2+6SERf3Gaxr sTg9poZavc8ExzvGpP3/t8xJiVgD7QBX8bd5iF5LEGxRrXTka1aFqw/wjhkUoaSJYL85 rUNiaRGaWHeq6unPSB9YvUwvw+PM1hCsqPEdcqtzO6KYx+StegEPTQ2EJipUH0TbrfBk mQEARsUe2NMOmotHqH1xZjeE7L/wMwfplWYs8rrJCrtXOJOn0P3k0IlmcLmY4kCdecaq Ogfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZTVrpWLIZZiskPAMoQXvMDXWYdUhrbUCHjJ6QLQBwopVjEFhk ASFUxKoHK3sfYAbv5gNX9Q+fDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymqRDS7aCC5+LCmHPbk12XaMGmyO8JI869mpSwvL1L+s3a8s0ee2CPCpojY5XXzdU39KLClA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2f7:: with SMTP id m23mr6896463lfq.517.1610375037710; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w23sm2310181lff.84.2021.01.11.06.23.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3623C102238; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:24:02 +0300 (+03) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:24:02 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Will Deacon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , Linux ARM , Catalin Marinas , Jan Kara , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Vinayak Menon , Hugh Dickins , Android Kernel Team Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Create 'old' ptes for faultaround mappings on arm64 with hardware access flag Message-ID: <20210111142402.6euyktmcnpemanf7@box> References: <20210108171517.5290-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:34:08AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I still dislike how we basically randomly modify the information in > that 'vmf' thing. I wounder if it would be acceptable to pass down to faultaround a copy of vmf, so it mess with it without risking to corrupt the original one? We would need to transfer back prealloc_pte, but the rest can be safely discarded, I believe. But it's somewhat wasteful of stack. sizeof(vmf) == 96 on x86-64. -- Kirill A. Shutemov