linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, ndesaulniers@google.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm: Separate fault info out of 'struct vm_fault'
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:41:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114194129.GA13314@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjdJmL22+zk3_rWAfEJJCf=oDxiJ530qk-WNk_Ji0qhxw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:09:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:00 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I tried that initially, but I found that I had to make all of the
> > members const to get it to work, at which point the anonymous struct
> > wasn't really adding anything. Did I just botch the syntax?
> 
> I'm not sure what you tried. But this stupid test-case sure works for me:
> 
>     struct hello {
>         const struct {
>                 unsigned long address;
>         };
>         unsigned int flags;
>     };
> 
>     extern int fn(struct hello *);
> 
>     int test(void)
>     {
>         struct hello a = {
>                 .address = 1,
>         };
>         a.flags = 0;
>         return fn(&a);
>     }
> 
> and because "address" is in that unnamed constant struct, you can only
> set it within that initializer, and cannot do
> 
>         a.address = 0;
> 
> without an error (the way you _can_ do "a.flags = 0").
> 
> I don't see naming the struct making a difference - apart from forcing
> that big rename patch, of course.
> 
> But maybe we're talking about different issues?

Urgh...

We _are_ both on the same page, and your reply above had me thinking I've
lost the plot, so I went back to the start. Check out v5.11-rc3 and apply
this patch:


diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index ecdf8a8cd6ae..1eb950865450 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -514,11 +514,14 @@ static inline bool fault_flag_allow_retry_first(unsigned int flags)
  * pgoff should be used in favour of virtual_address, if possible.
  */
 struct vm_fault {
-       struct vm_area_struct *vma;     /* Target VMA */
+       const struct {
+               struct vm_area_struct *vma;     /* Target VMA */
+               gfp_t gfp_mask;                 /* gfp mask to be used for allocations */
+               pgoff_t pgoff;                  /* Logical page offset based on vma */
+               unsigned long address;          /* Faulting virtual address */
+       };
+
        unsigned int flags;             /* FAULT_FLAG_xxx flags */
-       gfp_t gfp_mask;                 /* gfp mask to be used for allocations */
-       pgoff_t pgoff;                  /* Logical page offset based on vma */
-       unsigned long address;          /* Faulting virtual address */
        pmd_t *pmd;                     /* Pointer to pmd entry matching
                                         * the 'address' */
        pud_t *pud;                     /* Pointer to pud entry matching


Sure enough, an arm64 defconfig builds perfectly alright with that change,
but it really shouldn't. I'm using clang 11.0.5, so I had another go with
GCC 9.2.1 and bang:

mm/filemap.c: In function ‘filemap_map_pages’:
mm/filemap.c:2963:16: error: assignment of member ‘address’ in read-only object
 2963 |   vmf->address += (xas.xa_index - last_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT;
      |                ^~
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:279: mm/filemap.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:1805: mm] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Nick -- any clue what's happening here? We would like that const anonymous
struct to behave like a const struct member, as the alternative (naming the
thing) results in a lot of refactoring churn.

Cheers,

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 17:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] Create 'old' ptes for faultaround mappings on arm64 with hardware access flag Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: Cleanup faultaround and finish_fault() codepaths Will Deacon
2021-02-09 20:24   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-10 11:44     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-10 14:57       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: Allow architectures to request 'old' entries when prefaulting Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64: mm: Implement arch_wants_old_prefaulted_pte() Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm: Separate fault info out of 'struct vm_fault' Will Deacon
2021-01-14 18:16   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 19:00     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14 19:09       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-14 19:41         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-01-14 20:09           ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-14 21:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-15  9:23             ` Will Deacon
2021-01-15 21:32               ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-20  0:00                 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm: Pass 'address' to map to do_set_pte() and drop FAULT_FLAG_PREFAULT Will Deacon
2021-01-14 18:17   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-15 10:24     ` Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm: Avoid modifying vmf.info.address in __collapse_huge_page_swapin() Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm: Use static initialisers for 'info' field of 'struct vm_fault' Will Deacon
2021-01-14 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm: Mark 'info' field of 'struct vm_fault' as 'const' Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114194129.GA13314@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).