From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/10] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:05:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120150510.GO1106298@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119202213.GI2260413@casper.infradead.org>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 08:22:13PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:29:44AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > +static vm_fault_t secretmem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > +{
> > + struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> > + struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> > + pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
> > + vm_fault_t ret = 0;
> > + unsigned long addr;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (((loff_t)vmf->pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) >= i_size_read(inode))
> > + return vmf_error(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + page = find_get_page(mapping, offset);
> > + if (!page) {
> > +
> > + page = secretmem_alloc_page(vmf->gfp_mask);
> > + if (!page)
> > + return vmf_error(-ENOMEM);
>
> Just use VM_FAULT_OOM directly.
Ok.
> > + err = add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, offset, vmf->gfp_mask);
> > + if (unlikely(err))
> > + goto err_put_page;
>
> What if the error is EEXIST because somebody else raced with you to add
> a new page to the page cache?
Right, for -EEXIST I need a retry here, thanks.
> > + err = set_direct_map_invalid_noflush(page, 1);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto err_del_page_cache;
>
> Does this work correctly if somebody else has a reference to the page
> in the meantime?
Yes, it does. If somebody else won the race that page was dropped from the
direct map and this call would be essentially a nop. And anyway, the very
next patch changes the way pages are removed from the direct map ;-)
> > + addr = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
> > + flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
> > +
> > + __SetPageUptodate(page);
>
> Once you've added it to the cache, somebody else can come along and try
> to lock it. They will set PageWaiter. Now you call __SetPageUptodate
> and wipe out their PageWaiter bit. So you won't wake them up when you
> unlock.
>
> You can call __SetPageUptodate before adding it to the page cache,
> but once it's visible to another thread, you can't do that.
Will fix.
> > + ret = VM_FAULT_LOCKED;
> > + }
> > +
> > + vmf->page = page;
>
> You're supposed to return the page locked, so use find_lock_page() instead
> of find_get_page().
Ok/
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +err_del_page_cache:
> > + delete_from_page_cache(page);
> > +err_put_page:
> > + put_page(page);
> > + return vmf_error(err);
> > +}
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 6:29 [PATCH v14 00/10] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 01/10] mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 02/10] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 03/10] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 04/10] set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually enabled Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-06 11:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 05/10] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Mike Rapoport
2021-01-19 20:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 15:05 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-01-20 16:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-01-20 17:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 06/10] secretmem: use PMD-size pages to amortize direct map fragmentation Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 07/10] secretmem: add memcg accounting Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 15:47 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 08/10] PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 09/10] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant Mike Rapoport
2020-12-03 23:39 ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-06 11:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-07 14:45 ` Qian Cai
2020-12-07 16:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-12-08 1:34 ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-03 6:29 ` [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2) Mike Rapoport
2020-12-12 6:16 ` John Hubbard
2020-12-12 13:59 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210120150510.GO1106298@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).