linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/setup: consolidate early memory reservations
Date: Tue,  2 Mar 2021 12:04:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302100406.22059-1-rppt@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Hi,

David noticed that we do some of memblock_reserve() calls after allocations
are possible:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6ba6bde3-1520-5cd0-f987-32d543f0b79f@redhat.com

The below patches consolidate early memory reservations done during
setup_arch() so that memory used by firmware, bootloader, kernel text/data
and the memory that should be excluded from the available memory for
whatever other reason is reserved before memblock allocations are possible.

The patches are rebased on v5.12-rc1 and I think x86 tree is the best way
to merge them.

v3:
* rebase on v5.12-rc1

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210128105711.10428-1-rppt@kernel.org
* get rid of trim_platform_memory_ranges() and call trim_snb_memory()
  directly, per Boris comments
* massage changelog and comments to use passive voice, per Boris
* add Acked-by and Reviewed-by, thanks Boris and David

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210115083255.12744-1-rppt@kernel.org

Mike Rapoport (2):
  x86/setup: consolidate early memory reservations
  x86/setup: merge several reservations of start of the memory

 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0



             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 10:04 Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-03-02 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/setup: consolidate early memory reservations Mike Rapoport
2021-03-02 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/setup: merge several reservations of start of the memory Mike Rapoport
2021-03-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/setup: consolidate early memory reservations Mike Rapoport
2021-03-10 17:59   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-18  6:53   ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210302100406.22059-1-rppt@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).