From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9570CC433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B18A64EB9 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:11:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1B18A64EB9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6C7086B0070; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:11:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6771C6B0071; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:11:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4F1856B0072; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:11:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA666B0070 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:11:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10F0824999B for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:11:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77922748680.07.8CDB8C4 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED65414FB96 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:42:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1615826554; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fGluRhk+PJrpzTtViETCiWQbIPiyTfmSvpP2ZDxvRgw=; b=VWEhKfsOYLHURNavR871EhK8f7kwwtw1W8PTLX/61eNdCin2havzT+5LeClsJ53mXbj6s0 GqOboAjRmFJXIHeez14l6zKvIjXUYZ2NJ69Vqgp+PH9Zo4E3v9DSvj7+Z8CGPMr6zzNeVU VNGYPCPgpzytJIvrNcG0WNVng7F2+b0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-243-cl6paFfuOZioICwlchD9fw-1; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:42:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cl6paFfuOZioICwlchD9fw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C9EDF8A0; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from carbon (unknown [10.36.110.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91A55C3E6; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 17:42:21 +0100 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer To: Mel Gorman Cc: Chuck Lever III , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , LKML , Linux-Net , Linux-MM , Linux NFS Mailing List , brouer@redhat.com, Ilias Apalodimas , Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/page_alloc: Add a bulk page allocator Message-ID: <20210315174221.1c9e0fe7@carbon> In-Reply-To: <20210315104204.GB3697@techsingularity.net> References: <20210312124609.33d4d4ba@carbon> <20210312145814.GA2577561@casper.infradead.org> <20210312160350.GW3697@techsingularity.net> <20210312210823.GE2577561@casper.infradead.org> <20210313131648.GY3697@techsingularity.net> <20210313163949.GI2577561@casper.infradead.org> <7D8C62E1-77FD-4B41-90D7-253D13715A6F@oracle.com> <20210313193343.GJ2577561@casper.infradead.org> <20210314125231.GA3697@techsingularity.net> <325875A2-A98A-4ECF-AFDF-0B70BCCB79AD@oracle.com> <20210315104204.GB3697@techsingularity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Stat-Signature: pbm948tt3b8adf3xys4bu39cjqh3e46x X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7ED65414FB96 Received-SPF: none (redhat.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf02; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; client-ip=216.205.24.124 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1615826556-378443 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:42:05 +0000 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 03:22:02PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > >> Anyway, I'm not arguing against a bulk allocator, nor even saying this > > >> is a bad interface. It just maybe could be better. > > >> > > > > > > I think it puts more responsibility on the caller to use the API correctly > > > but I also see no value in arguing about it further because there is no > > > supporting data either way (I don't have routine access to a sufficiently > > > fast network to generate the data). I can add the following patch and let > > > callers figure out which interface is preferred. If one of the interfaces > > > is dead in a year, it can be removed. > > > > > > As there are a couple of ways the arrays could be used, I'm leaving it > > > up to Jesper and Chuck which interface they want to use. In particular, > > > it would be preferred if the array has no valid struct pages in it but > > > it's up to them to judge how practical that is. > > > > I'm interested to hear from Jesper. > > > > My two cents (US): > > > > If svc_alloc_arg() is the /only/ consumer that wants to fill > > a partially populated array of page pointers, then there's no > > code-duplication benefit to changing the synopsis of > > alloc_pages_bulk() at this point. > > > > Also, if the consumers still have to pass in the number of > > pages the array needs, rather than having the bulk allocator > > figure it out, then there's not much additional benefit, IMO. > > > > Ideally (for SUNRPC) alloc_pages_bulk() would take a pointer > > to a sparsely-populated array and the total number of elements > > in that array, and fill in the NULL elements. The return value > > would be "success -- all elements are populated" or "failure -- > > some elements remain NULL". > > > > If the array API interface was expected to handle sparse arrays, it would > make sense to define nr_pages are the number of pages that need to be > in the array instead of the number of pages to allocate. The preamble > would skip the first N number of allocated pages and decrement nr_pages > accordingly before the watermark check. The return value would then be the > last populated array element and the caller decides if that is enough to > proceed or if the API needs to be called again. There is a slight risk > that with a spare array that only needed 1 page in reality would fail > the watermark check but on low memory, allocations take more work anyway. > That definition of nr_pages would avoid the potential buffer overrun but > both you and Jesper would need to agree that it's an appropriate API. I actually like the idea of doing it this way. Even-though the page_pool fast-path (__page_pool_get_cached()) doesn't clear/mark the "consumed" elements with NULL. I'm ready to change page_pool to handle this when calling this API, as I think it will be faster than walking the linked list. Even-though my page_pool use-case doesn't have a sparse array to populate (like NFS/SUNRPC) then I can still use this API that Chuck is suggesting. Thus, I'm fine with this :-) (p.s. working on implementing Alexander Duyck's suggestions, but I don't have it ready yet, I will try to send new patch tomorrow. And I do realize that with this API change I have to reimplement it again, but as long as we make forward progress then I'll happily do it). -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer /* fast path */ static struct page *__page_pool_get_cached(struct page_pool *pool) { struct page *page; /* Caller MUST guarantee safe non-concurrent access, e.g. softirq */ if (likely(pool->alloc.count)) { /* Fast-path */ page = pool->alloc.cache[--pool->alloc.count]; } else { page = page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(pool); } return page; }