linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] percpu: partial chunk depopulation
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:26:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407182618.2728388-1-guro@fb.com> (raw)

In our production experience the percpu memory allocator is sometimes struggling
with returning the memory to the system. A typical example is a creation of
several thousands memory cgroups (each has several chunks of the percpu data
used for vmstats, vmevents, ref counters etc). Deletion and complete releasing
of these cgroups doesn't always lead to a shrinkage of the percpu memory,
so that sometimes there are several GB's of memory wasted.

The underlying problem is the fragmentation: to release an underlying chunk
all percpu allocations should be released first. The percpu allocator tends
to top up chunks to improve the utilization. It means new small-ish allocations
(e.g. percpu ref counters) are placed onto almost filled old-ish chunks,
effectively pinning them in memory.

This patchset pretends to solve this problem by implementing a partial
depopulation of percpu chunks: chunks with many empty pages are being
asynchronously depopulated and the pages are returned to the system.

To illustrate the problem the following script can be used:

--
#!/bin/bash

cd /sys/fs/cgroup

mkdir percpu_test
echo "+memory" > percpu_test/cgroup.subtree_control

cat /proc/meminfo | grep Percpu

for i in `seq 1 1000`; do
    mkdir percpu_test/cg_"${i}"
    for j in `seq 1 10`; do
	mkdir percpu_test/cg_"${i}"_"${j}"
    done
done

cat /proc/meminfo | grep Percpu

for i in `seq 1 1000`; do
    for j in `seq 1 10`; do
	rmdir percpu_test/cg_"${i}"_"${j}"
    done
done

sleep 10

cat /proc/meminfo | grep Percpu

for i in `seq 1 1000`; do
    rmdir percpu_test/cg_"${i}"
done

rmdir percpu_test
--

It creates 11000 memory cgroups and removes every 10 out of 11.
It prints the initial size of the percpu memory, the size after
creating all cgroups and the size after deleting most of them.

Results:
  vanilla:
    ./percpu_test.sh
    Percpu:             7488 kB
    Percpu:           481152 kB
    Percpu:           481152 kB

  with this patchset applied:
    ./percpu_test.sh
    Percpu:             7488 kB
    Percpu:           481408 kB
    Percpu:           135552 kB

So the total size of the percpu memory was reduced by more than 3.5 times.


v2:
  - depopulated chunks are sidelined
  - depopulation happens in the reverse order
  - depopulate list made per-chunk type
  - better results due to better heuristics

v1:
  - depopulation heuristics changed and optimized
  - chunks are put into a separate list, depopulation scan this list
  - chunk->isolated is introduced, chunk->depopulate is dropped
  - rearranged patches a bit
  - fixed a panic discovered by krobot
  - made pcpu_nr_empty_pop_pages per chunk type
  - minor fixes

rfc:
  https://lwn.net/Articles/850508/


Roman Gushchin (5):
  percpu: fix a comment about the chunks ordering
  percpu: split __pcpu_balance_workfn()
  percpu: make pcpu_nr_empty_pop_pages per chunk type
  percpu: generalize pcpu_balance_populated()
  percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation

 mm/percpu-internal.h |   4 +-
 mm/percpu-stats.c    |   9 +-
 mm/percpu.c          | 282 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2



             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 18:26 Roman Gushchin [this message]
2021-04-07 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] percpu: fix a comment about the chunks ordering Roman Gushchin
2021-04-07 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] percpu: split __pcpu_balance_workfn() Roman Gushchin
2021-04-07 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] percpu: make pcpu_nr_empty_pop_pages per chunk type Roman Gushchin
2021-04-07 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] percpu: generalize pcpu_balance_populated() Roman Gushchin
2021-04-07 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation Roman Gushchin
2021-04-08  2:34   ` Dennis Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210407182618.2728388-1-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).