From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9940CC433B4 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA3661178 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:04:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0BA3661178 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 723E16B006C; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:04:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6ABD16B006E; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:04:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5257A6B0070; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:04:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0042.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339DB6B006C for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:04:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A7198A5 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:04:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78011638740.07.B84E645 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A56E0001AC for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 325B061165; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:04:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1617944688; bh=iBZJg2qunvF7v3TtboIlcuUe7mCGQTTjlXG5RowbNuM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=adLu+IYoQ7vk7/cFv+oy0OjM4dI0Fkt/4xsMjVGSoZD7vRwf/RColxjqeB9UXBB72 ubv+mWWeZjLsFl6JK0afRRIgsWPHCt9pvMARzw2h4oP/wuMRaOZF+8YhKYaMMmOBA4 evHoB2QvhdlSOcTjDfAu/EBIDzBiX1XH1PwY3oJM= Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:04:40 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Axel Rasmussen Cc: Alexander Viro , Andrea Arcangeli , Daniel Colascione , Hugh Dickins , Jerome Glisse , Joe Perches , Lokesh Gidra , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Peter Xu , Shaohua Li , Shuah Khan , Stephen Rothwell , Wang Qing , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Brian Geffon , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , Mina Almasry , Oliver Upton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] userfaultfd: add minor fault handling for shmem Message-Id: <20210408220440.aab59f2f06beb840c22377b3@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210408234327.624367-1-axelrasmussen@google.com> References: <20210408234327.624367-1-axelrasmussen@google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 57A56E0001AC X-Stat-Signature: n1x6n654y7urbwo4bzkjhdsikk8k4xdm X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 Received-SPF: none (linux-foundation.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf21; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kernel.org; client-ip=198.145.29.99 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1617944689-256293 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:43:18 -0700 Axel Rasmussen wrote: > The idea is that it will apply cleanly to akpm's tree, *replacing* the following > patches (i.e., drop these first, and then apply this series): > > userfaultfd-support-minor-fault-handling-for-shmem.patch > userfaultfd-support-minor-fault-handling-for-shmem-fix.patch > userfaultfd-support-minor-fault-handling-for-shmem-fix-2.patch > userfaultfd-support-minor-fault-handling-for-shmem-fix-3.patch > userfaultfd-support-minor-fault-handling-for-shmem-fix-4.patch > userfaultfd-selftests-use-memfd_create-for-shmem-test-type.patch > userfaultfd-selftests-create-alias-mappings-in-the-shmem-test.patch > userfaultfd-selftests-reinitialize-test-context-in-each-test.patch > userfaultfd-selftests-exercise-minor-fault-handling-shmem-support.patch Well. the problem is, > + if (area_alias == MAP_FAILED) > + err("mmap of memfd alias failed"); `err' doesn't exist until eleventy patches later, in Peter's "userfaultfd/selftests: unify error handling". I got tired of (and lost confidence in) replacing "err(...)" with "fprintf(stderr, ...); exit(1)" everywhere then fixing up the fallout when Peter's patch came along. Shudder. Sorry, all this material pretty clearly isn't going to make 5.12 (potentially nine days hence), so I shall drop all the userfaultfd patches. Let's take a fresh run at all of this after -rc1. I have tentatively retained the first series: userfaultfd-add-minor-fault-registration-mode.patch userfaultfd-add-minor-fault-registration-mode-fix.patch userfaultfd-disable-huge-pmd-sharing-for-minor-registered-vmas.patch userfaultfd-hugetlbfs-only-compile-uffd-helpers-if-config-enabled.patch userfaultfd-add-uffdio_continue-ioctl.patch userfaultfd-update-documentation-to-describe-minor-fault-handling.patch userfaultfd-selftests-add-test-exercising-minor-fault-handling.patch but I don't believe they have had much testing standalone, without the other userfaultfd patches present. So I don't think it's smart to upstream these in this cycle. Or I could drop them so you and Peter can have a clean shot at redoing the whole thing. Please let me know.