linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"HORIGUCHI NAOYA( 堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	yaoaili@kingsoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Fix machine check recovery for copy_from_user
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 14:49:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409144909.3488db39@alex-virtual-machine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595ed0ac4fbb470ca9cfd256aaf1810e@intel.com>

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:39:09 +0000
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:

> > I have one scenario, may you take into account:
> >
> > If one copyin case occurs, write() returned by your patch, the user process may
> > check the return values, for errors, it may exit the process, then the error page
> > will be freed, and then the page maybe alloced to other process or to kernel itself,
> > then code will initialize it and this will trigger one SRAO, if it's used by kernel,
> > we may do nothing for this, and kernel may still touch it, and lead to one panic.  
> 
> In this case kill_me_never() calls memory_failure() with flags == 0. I think (hope!)
> that means that it will unmap the page from the task, but will not send a signal.
> 
> When the task exits the PTE for this page has the swap/poison signature, so the
> page is not freed for re-use.
> 
> -Tony

Oh, Yes, Sorry for my rudeness and error-understandings, I just happen to can't control my emotions and get confused for some other things.

Thanks!
Aili Yao


      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26  0:02 Tony Luck
2021-03-26  0:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/mce: Fix copyin code to return -EFAULT on machine check Tony Luck
2021-04-06 19:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-26  0:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] mce/iter: Check for copyin failure & return error up stack Tony Luck
2021-03-26  0:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] mce/copyin: fix to not SIGBUS when copying from user hits poison Tony Luck
2021-04-07 21:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-07 21:43     ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-08  8:49       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-08 17:08         ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-13 10:07           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-13 16:13             ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-14 13:05               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-03-26  0:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user recovery Tony Luck
2021-04-08 13:36   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-08 16:06     ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-08  2:13 ` [RFC 0/4] Fix machine check recovery for copy_from_user Aili Yao
2021-04-08 14:39   ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-09  6:49     ` Aili Yao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210409144909.3488db39@alex-virtual-machine \
    --to=yaoaili@kingsoft.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [RFC 0/4] Fix machine check recovery for copy_from_user' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).