From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] 4.14 backports of fixes for "CoW after fork() issue"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:05:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210421210517.GA6404@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpHJjtv_=jLULge8D4EK_AK2yGLMcWKcGSaknzuWm0DFtA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Suren,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:01:34PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Peter, you mentioned https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/10/439 patch to
> distinguish real writes vs enforced COW read requests, however I also
> see that you had a later version of this patch here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1286506/. Which one should I
> backport? Or is it not needed in the absence of uffd-wp support in the
> earlier kernels?
Sorry I have no ability to evaluate the rest... but according to Linus's
previous reply, my understanding is that it is not needed, not to mention it's
not upstreamed too.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 18:17 [PATCH 0/5] 4.14 backports of fixes for "CoW after fork() issue" Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: reuse only-pte-mapped KSM page in do_wp_page() Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 19:38 ` Greg KH
2021-04-01 19:47 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: do_wp_page() simplification Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 18:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: fix misplaced unlock_page in do_wp_page() Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 18:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] userfaultfd: wp: add helper for writeprotect check Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 18:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/userfaultfd: fix memory corruption due to writeprotect Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 18:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] 4.14 backports of fixes for "CoW after fork() issue" Linus Torvalds
2021-04-01 19:43 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-01 23:47 ` Peter Xu
2021-04-02 0:12 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-07 13:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-07 14:30 ` Peter Xu
2021-04-07 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-07 16:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-07 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-07 18:47 ` Mikulas Patocka
2021-04-07 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-07 21:53 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-21 20:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-21 21:05 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-04-21 21:17 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-21 23:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-04-21 22:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-21 23:05 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210421210517.GA6404@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).