From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8ED0C433B4 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 02:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7C061041 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 02:38:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AE7C061041 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kingsoft.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2A2E38D0023; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:38:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2529E8D0014; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:38:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0A5D98D0023; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:38:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0217.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.217]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01268D0014 for ; Fri, 7 May 2021 22:38:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892FB6C3A for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 02:38:49 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78116505978.07.CA26AA1 Received: from mail.kingsoft.com (unknown [114.255.44.146]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD31A0003B3 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 02:38:32 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 0a580157-bd3ff70000027901-d7-6095f9b3d717 Received: from mail.kingsoft.com (localhost [10.88.1.79]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.kingsoft.com (SMG-1-NODE-87) with SMTP id B0.36.30977.3B9F5906; Sat, 8 May 2021 10:38:43 +0800 (HKT) Received: from alex-virtual-machine (10.88.1.103) by KSBJMAIL4.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 8 May 2021 10:38:42 +0800 Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 10:38:42 +0800 From: Aili Yao To: "HORIGUCHI =?UTF-8?B?TkFPWUE=?=(=?UTF-8?B?5aCA5Y+j44CA55u05Lmf?=)" , "Luck, Tony" CC: Naoya Horiguchi , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , "Oscar Salvador" , David Hildenbrand , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , "Jue Wang" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "yaoaili126@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action Required MCE Message-ID: <20210508103842.7dc6e8b1@alex-virtual-machine> In-Reply-To: References: <20210421005728.1994268-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com> <87ba79daaba1416589b203118be096cb@intel.com> <20210507052422.GB2158342@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> <20210507191400.6258dee6@alex-virtual-machine> Organization: kingsoft X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.88.1.103] X-ClientProxiedBy: KSBJMAIL1.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.31) To KSBJMAIL4.kingsoft.cn (10.88.1.79) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFcHor7v559QEgz0LuCzmrF/DZvF5wz82 i6/rfzFb3LxlYnF51xw2i3tr/rNanN+1ltVi1bw7zBYXGw8wWpyZVmTx5sI9FotnrVdZHHg8 vrf2sXjsnHWX3WPBplKPxXteMnlsWtXJ5rHp0yR2jxMzfrN4vLi6kcXj/b6rbB6bT1d7fN4k F8AdxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJWx5/UZloKJ7BVLG9ewNTCeZ+1i5OSQEDCRWPztNlsXIxeHkMB0 Jompi+4wQjjPGCUubznKDlLFIqAi8f1PDzOIzSagKrHr3ixWkCIRgTZGifVrzoO1MwusYJaY fmIiE0iVsECoxNlfTxlBbF4BK4mleyH2cQpYSvQ+O8UOsWIrk8T8xqNgY/kFxCR6r/wHauYA Ospe4vF6RYheQYmTM5+wgNjMAjoSJ1YdY4aw5SW2v50DZgsJKEocXvKLHeIfeYm7v6czQtix Ek0HbrFNYBSehWTULCSjZiEZtYCReRUjS3FuuuEmRkjche9gnNf0Ue8QIxMH4yFGCQ5mJRHe 04smJwjxpiRWVqUW5ccXleakFh9ilOZgURLnbZwJlBJITyxJzU5NLUgtgskycXBKNTDxZ5ys /ZnJyiKb1TPvO19ASIKWjLbDcpV51wPj1rbnyfyZb5Vk9UFD4U3c0U3xh95f4/nh5d6YOUfj gNb5E6JN75fnbVrGLHi6Nrr78467z6XsTfg37IxfXr9W+tKp9SqsytzpPyc+yVIoOP7pftZD m51zZjk9mCperR3BMrfb+94adYtL/fkbLcXPautsqrpi36F04sq5BQarJFS2GNVfCEk/m9Md x7TnRtymx1b375UVmL8uv8h/MMT29eng4wusdQNFtrjGuR1J6l2VEFMfMmXKiaQX3KmRPG1P oz5v3Ph19vu93YYR3nvm75u44s+sKerBHzavMFyQzfinJ2rXVTbO2MCrFzf8+hl6VFZQiaU4 I9FQi7moOBEA29DGoCoDAAA= Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of yaoaili@kingsoft.com designates 114.255.44.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yaoaili@kingsoft.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DCD31A0003B3 X-Stat-Signature: fiu7dsk57ykpt9msqjkifis9k3kz8atq Received-SPF: none (kingsoft.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf24; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kingsoft.com; client-ip=114.255.44.146 X-HE-DKIM-Result: none/none X-HE-Tag: 1620441512-900558 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 7 May 2021 18:02:13 +0000 "Luck, Tony" wrote: > > Before cc:stable, would you please do one stress test first? > > It failed in my server, but I didn't dig into it, maybe the fail is meaningless. > > Just a small suggestion. > > Upstream plus these three patches passed an overnight 8-hour stress test > on four machines here (running a test that's been failing with hung kernels > and kernel crashes w/o these patches). > > What were the symptoms of your failed server? > Sorry, I am not sure if the stress test in my server is same with yours. Usually, I will do one RAS stress test from mce-test/cases/stress before post something. Maybe this test is not general useful or you have tested it and passed or you may think the test is not proper though or you tested and you don't think it's one real issue, then just ignore it please. Thanks! Aili Yao