From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031F2C47092 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9561C613F2 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:36:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9561C613F2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A43666B006C; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:36:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9F35D6B006E; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:36:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 86C986B0070; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:36:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0088.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.88]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531DA6B006C for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:36:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5F25DF5 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:36:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78210243216.23.D2E99FC Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617208019367 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F22D9613D6; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 22:36:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1622673367; bh=GxpUd87XU+MpRXZ2PlmVvtGMToV2jbK/XAXadLJc3Ek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B0f90I0IPVDpINHUZhHINCCb4mVM7ylkWMMqbnJwDr0CcXwdyF3mCb8FmTmSk0Vdi VJQ+4HxM7CeXzFsx6Iqo8q1vVe2P78XqCP5xqESVQVT4DoBp9g9/ftL6Pve6SSYeUD iJzFOQbHveg39VR7xkrDaa63fDGZIHAtrOscrlWk= Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:36:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Peter Xu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Axel Rasmussen , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Miaohe Lin , Mike Rapoport , Jerome Glisse , Andrea Arcangeli , Nadav Amit , Mike Kravetz , Jason Gunthorpe , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Message-Id: <20210602153606.93cfe1dfdaa2e11a2d863df2@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20210527201927.29586-1-peterx@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 617208019367 Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=B0f90I0I; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: jxk9yyhug5qocm99raa98df7p96su95j X-HE-Tag: 1622673355-416416 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:40:04 -0400 Peter Xu wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 04:19:00PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > > This is v3 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a > > kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series. It's > > based on latest v5.13-rc3-mmots-2021-05-25-20-12. > > Andrew, > > Any suggestion on how I should move on with this series? > It is large, and thinly reviewed. I haven't seriously looked at it yet. If nothing much else happens I might toss it in there for some additional exposure but I do think more input from other developers is needed before we go further.