From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40870C11F68 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADA661466 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:48:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EADA661466 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7068D8D01F2; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6DD748D01D0; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:48:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5A6008D01F2; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:48:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0055.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EDC8D01D0 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04616181AEF3F for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:48:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78312335094.20.282EE6E Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA99100009D for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F58A6120C; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 01:48:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1625104125; bh=YOOzhUTqf7KWYxyFvUMrP7gImFxTqWLWGXQUYUpxmeA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=EJHnh/B3d/0pOYMZqS6aopctm3R0gDAN9d5JEQoG3t9Z5lb5svMvm/qPEaqLoPqf9 HhYpYuXNcBvhLgwWl1HDPUBg/MWQM6FRBq8ftpB2V+mMSriNq0bpm7LHG4gLG8X+qm Kz+fEWYL71ZAlLuiXM98ZfQTdNyvt6ZJiMZLZxpY= Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:48:44 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: aarcange@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, almasrymina@google.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, bgeffon@google.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, jglisse@redhat.com, joe@perches.com, kirill@shutemov.name, linux-mm@kvack.org, lokeshgidra@google.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, oupton@google.com, peterx@redhat.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, shli@fb.com, shuah@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, wangqing@vivo.com Subject: [patch 031/192] userfaultfd/selftests: remove the time() check on delayed uffd Message-ID: <20210701014844.ASqKQfeHh%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210630184624.9ca1937310b0dd5ce66b30e7@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: ABA99100009D X-Stat-Signature: qf5dqbwwx1cgkh91atjkuc6ipekmj644 Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b="EJHnh/B3"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org X-HE-Tag: 1625104126-542919 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Peter Xu Subject: userfaultfd/selftests: remove the time() check on delayed uffd There seems to have no guarantee that time() will return the same for the two calls even if there's no delay, e.g. when a fault is accidentally crossing the changing of a second. Meanwhile, this message is also not helping that much since delay could happen with a lot of reasons, e.g., schedule latency of resolving thread. It may not mean an issue with uffd. Neither do I saw this error triggered either in the past runs. Even if it triggers, it'll be drown in all the rest of test logs. Remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210412232753.1012412-3-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Brian Geffon Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Jerome Glisse Cc: Joe Perches Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: Lokesh Gidra Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Mina Almasry Cc: Oliver Upton Cc: Shaohua Li Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-selftests-remove-the-time-check-on-delayed-uffd +++ a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c @@ -395,7 +395,6 @@ static void *locking_thread(void *arg) unsigned long long count; char randstate[64]; unsigned int seed; - time_t start; if (bounces & BOUNCE_RANDOM) { seed = (unsigned int) time(NULL) - bounces; @@ -432,7 +431,6 @@ static void *locking_thread(void *arg) page_nr += 1; page_nr %= nr_pages; - start = time(NULL); if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY) { count = *area_count(area_dst, page_nr); if (!count) { @@ -495,12 +493,6 @@ static void *locking_thread(void *arg) count++; *area_count(area_dst, page_nr) = count_verify[page_nr] = count; pthread_mutex_unlock(area_mutex(area_dst, page_nr)); - - if (time(NULL) - start > 1) - fprintf(stderr, - "userfault too slow %ld " - "possible false positive with overcommit\n", - time(NULL) - start); } return NULL; _