From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679F2C433F5 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A26F60F13 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:33:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 0A26F60F13 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8F9076B0071; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8A8AD900002; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:33:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 76F776B0073; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:33:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0028.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.28]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F176B0071 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257C01809A4AF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:33:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78616510896.28.A6167D6 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC7F000091 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:33:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10115"; a="246150219" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,315,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="246150219" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2021 14:33:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,315,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="454881380" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2021 14:33:21 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2A2FF; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:33:26 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:33:26 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: "Zhang, Xiang1" , "H.J. Lu" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Dave Hansen , "Lutomirski, Andy" , Peter Zijlstra , the arch/x86 maintainers , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andi Kleen , Linux-MM , LKML , Carlos O'Donell , Marco Elver , Taras Madan Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] Linear Address Masking enabling Message-ID: <20210922213326.d4n57ml5vehmyaad@black.fi.intel.com> References: <20210205151631.43511-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20210207141104.ikxbdxhoisgqaoio@box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 43EC7F000091 Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.88) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com X-Stat-Signature: 8gydoxujkw777wifpnaqzuc4uz7tecie X-HE-Tag: 1632346407-576448 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > 6. The kernel patches (this email thread) depend on the CET patches > > (for the interface part only). And the CET patches is this, right? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/?q=x86%2Fcet%2Fshstk CET is two part patchset: shstk and ibt. Look for x86/cet/ibt. At this point we plan to use CET interface, but it's not settled until it actually lands upstream. -- Kirill A. Shutemov