From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0E8C433FE for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5B61027 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:36:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5ED5B61027 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DCB416B006C; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:36:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D7B446B0071; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:36:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C428F900002; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:36:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0032.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.32]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B590D6B006C for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:36:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759BE2D228 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:36:57 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78670195674.01.B0F7D0B Received: from mail-qt1-f175.google.com (mail-qt1-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA73D0013D2 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f175.google.com with SMTP id c20so6764004qtb.2 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:36:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=R+nvG1YUcjlBXRbcjhflH1DRtQsxGyawawppd16ek2g=; b=A5xp4fqdGPwkI/MCF//eOcPwfi8uSH1Ia3f4IAtTn/OYz2jNeTC4fy1j8j/kQ0tb5B fgmqP+xnm/FTnZ1kEGMlZ76vYKRhBqklUmJYXQhfgCMtYZw9/N43EdXzTn2dg0qiQEaV 2lL39oykZBLCubAh0oIW5HmIKRCSVRMcjsxX4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=R+nvG1YUcjlBXRbcjhflH1DRtQsxGyawawppd16ek2g=; b=DgEliQ9T0iomgrfObAWySZZiQLTxTlZrquOk7RuEudhsUc5pNr/162xysxg82X6KYC qPoQxw2+4SM1t8UnUn5MFBPNPcGX0oRw8NJCdNU9P6eyXyhAkjVoNZ0SIR3lQWiZEQc6 2EPLKkZgSReRE0EJRAxSF5jfIQL8CVw+S3iHwHGKAMoHesftOVbJ78zMbpaw1io7uB2D o5qtLg27GsmnUARwagL/3r5IQwqUK2DH6I2swRjE+QD4cL4/MIxIVPhefGRsuQaXAZx6 jyuuA9936q29dsfXwl2u9BtPX54AVyPtO2R97J8jDpkQt+TBYzq2+UJJ9h6zQD3VeitN VTjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gGcWIy6xgKCuunjo5Z5N1K1PQLkyHmCkk/Ku7lZ10cpFBQxHE v9dK4DGqBwFDYC21XAXECoPwWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZgLJTWRUxz5TniPZJDmnQfLCbw51HS1BmI2bx80OU/NhQ6y2KNQKl3DkhqsfzXnvWnRdwZA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:24c:: with SMTP id o12mr6221362qtg.99.1633624616445; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meerkat.local (bras-base-mtrlpq5031w-grc-32-216-209-220-181.dsl.bell.ca. [216.209.220.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm20466qka.34.2021.10.07.09.36.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:36:54 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Jens Axboe , LKML , Linux Memory Management List , Andrew Morton , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Howard McLauchlan , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't call should_failslab() for !CONFIG_FAILSLAB Message-ID: <20211007163654.44wiufdolvqkddnd@meerkat.local> References: <2dfc6273-6cdd-f4f5-bed9-400873ac9152@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2dfc6273-6cdd-f4f5-bed9-400873ac9152@suse.cz> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1FA73D0013D2 X-Stat-Signature: 49tepzs7mf4p43ei8m73apo1fy6b65p5 Authentication-Results: imf15.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=A5xp4fqd; spf=pass (imf15.hostedemail.com: domain of konstantin@linuxfoundation.org designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org X-HE-Tag: 1633624616-687121 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 05:32:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 10/5/21 17:31, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Allocations can be a very hot path, and this out-of-line function > > call is noticeable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe > > It used to be inline b4 (hi, Konstantin!) Congratulations, you made me look. :) -K