From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FF9C433F5 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F3E61251 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:00:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B8F3E61251 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 45DD46B0072; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:00:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 40B486B0074; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:00:04 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2D3A06B0075; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:00:04 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0108.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.108]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2193A6B0072 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:00:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BBE82BBAF2 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:00:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78793028286.30.CE20377 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291F1B00019C for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 602CC610A8; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:00:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1636549201; bh=vRGoovHr51rN6594fQkK0ZFynKTYvUJYr5YGyECiS4w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TDlY+F0q9dZG8mfukx8en3pae51hU4cL2h+b75RqtaLIDin7jrMPTpBUs5UP00dxp lX1r2ZhKZ3WFyzCXSLn6cT9rjYWGC3VfrV/uD4gkhkCuPhSr02yEWUOwoB2WJ/31yW F8zMuZhLoCWsVfqulC6wokPb/11Of+eg+WeVHvk++u0FqtHP7wxsmXo4sj7tUnrcru QvuNsZYcpUKTBO5xaTTN+gv0/jvLp5fdPjmNFR/c3vr3qweKiI8pKQyIk0qGMFHPjU 9mRN7kZ4MG9NX6wDjo8nXo9cEexmqTgcIh/8uMfSVwpN1f+hQwfSeygm7wET0se3ir wfVX3MNOYC62w== From: SeongJae Park To: Xin Hao Cc: sjpark@amazon.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] mm/damon: Unified access_check function naming rules Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:59:59 +0000 Message-Id: <20211110125959.18141-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <556ab139a12296744d25f76b99f4e6b7ccfaf131.1636546262.git.xhao@linux.alibaba.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 291F1B00019C X-Stat-Signature: 66iuokgj8afcea6dgzy997tnircbfgte Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=TDlY+F0q; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org X-HE-Tag: 1636549191-244938 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:13:13 +0800 Xin Hao wrote: > In damon/paddr.c file, two functions names start with underscore, > static void __damon_pa_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx, > struct damon_region *r) > static void __damon_pa_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx, > struct damon_region *r) > In damon/vaddr.c file, there are also two functions with the same function, > static void damon_va_prepare_access_check(struct damon_ctx *ctx, > struct mm_struct *mm, struct damon_region *r) > static void damon_va_check_access(struct damon_ctx *ctx, > struct mm_struct *mm, struct damon_region *r) > > It makes sense to keep consistent, and it is not easy to be confused with > the function that call them. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park Thanks, SJ [...]