From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58574C433F5 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B97996B0074; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:57:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B43CB6B0075; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:57:29 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9E51F6B0078; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:57:29 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.27]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014B46B0074 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:57:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14EC6181C for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:57:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79152272976.05.2C4128D Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE58540005 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:57:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1645102647; x=1676638647; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=muUyZFkT/XUwYXtZ4KuQ8w3WazrYqWNDm8XTjig5hYY=; b=PXU8An2fmhMuFeRl0ceTCNDxvcN8uW82wsmXPlDvhN3yRr0Fw2vTwri/ wCEPonvzIY26BLarr8rWAB8hY2mYRxXRbgz8Lr8Ol1iLH7yQJx9J2QMgJ 6W23PPA4Uui28dGH0iCmcX+nMt6SYysjG+hJ98ti85JbmV+AT/YveJkrE qBx/WP1A9JWMsyMyJ9z6VOdULcPgjzcJOkPjW5VRcysUton/gXKBXbnEB kW2fAn82ZY30iP+SstMk3S4Fsf/3r7gfC6lXkeYd6sn02uyJ+5zRGAlwU s0A82FrUGIhQ4GUryWIgJPGWRpvYjC8i3aLVwFGh6c0cS7ZMRfJ7SdRaX w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10260"; a="248462551" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,375,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="248462551" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2022 04:57:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,375,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="704785987" Received: from chaop.bj.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.240.192.101]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2022 04:57:18 -0800 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:56:57 +0800 From: Chao Peng To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Hugh Dickins , Jeff Layton , "J . Bruce Fields" , Andrew Morton , Yu Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , luto@kernel.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: Introduce F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE Message-ID: <20220217125656.GA32679@chaop.bj.intel.com> Reply-To: Chao Peng References: <20220118132121.31388-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <20220118132121.31388-2-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <64407833-1387-0c46-c569-8b6a3db8e88c@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64407833-1387-0c46-c569-8b6a3db8e88c@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CE58540005 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=PXU8An2f; spf=none (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.93) smtp.mailfrom=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Stat-Signature: rrck7t3ekmt4fda5roaahdz6bii1x9z8 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-HE-Tag: 1645102647-955566 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:24:42PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 1/18/22 14:21, Chao Peng wrote: > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" > > > > /* > > diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c > > index 18f93c2d68f1..72185630e7c4 100644 > > --- a/mm/shmem.c > > +++ b/mm/shmem.c > > @@ -1098,6 +1098,13 @@ static int shmem_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, > > (newsize > oldsize && (info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW))) > > return -EPERM; > > > > + if (info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE) { > > + if(i_size_read(inode)) > > Is this needed? The rest of the function seems to trust oldsize obtained by > plain reading inode->i_size well enough, so why be suddenly paranoid here? oldsize sounds enough here, unless kirill has different mind. > > > + return -EPERM; > > + if (newsize & ~PAGE_MASK) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > if (newsize != oldsize) { > > error = shmem_reacct_size(SHMEM_I(inode)->flags, > > + if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE) && > > + (offset & ~PAGE_MASK || len & ~PAGE_MASK)) { > > Could we use PAGE_ALIGNED()? Yes, definitely, thanks. Chao > > > + error = -EINVAL; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > shmem_falloc.waitq = &shmem_falloc_waitq; > > shmem_falloc.start = (u64)unmap_start >> PAGE_SHIFT; > > shmem_falloc.next = (unmap_end + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;