From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9EBC433F5 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 23:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E8F3C6B0071; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:55:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E3EEC6B0073; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:55:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D06FE6B0074; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:55:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.28]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE586B0071 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:55:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EA323AC4 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 23:55:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79342627770.15.8EC225E Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3481F140002 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 23:55:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649634903; x=1681170903; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=8Mx4eKFVr0fQGB09ANO23LBc1IXsd9gKMI9x9LYS73M=; b=BxV6btQUOBbM6+jLVCIFGcR1aIE/uvcGJmEzhnojQn/o/B3/FwH/LmW2 2oSmYH+SOSK5JVwmWUZUr+hcpWtOLhZvzy5aSx5Ob/4eQaCs7F/yCtn7q 5hOHos/Qr1kNuW8SwE5NEdT1o23hlrCI0LqonzoZnFMFl+FSXPPEDtYqk 0sUv0RDpER6p3WDqyKqQ9MaJ6Wi6ed5tYAwEpLW5hovMK69rk3qiYXWJd BneLQaxD7YrvWukWLh6pPiHUdnIkpj3FrJwa/bKHBjdNLueOj3CgxLCD9 RIotBweEg6Qswxm/Jkm1Vy1RzxdIzF3t4drcqacW+BLNg/C8xXKNnbrQG g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10313"; a="348439699" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,250,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="348439699" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2022 16:55:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,250,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="853691241" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO d3fc50ef50de) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2022 16:54:58 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d3fc50ef50de with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ndhOU-0001CJ-3b; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 23:54:58 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:54:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Shiyang Ruan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, djwong@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, jane.chu@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/7] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Message-ID: <202204110700.66Eh1XZg-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220410160904.3758789-7-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220410160904.3758789-7-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3481F140002 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=BxV6btQU; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.43) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com X-Stat-Signature: zduxhz7bindbowaku885nhxhop6i19xi X-HE-Tag: 1649634902-41580 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Shiyang, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on hnaz-mm/master] [also build test ERROR on next-20220408] [cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next linus/master linux/master v5.18-rc1] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220411-001048 base: https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220411/202204110700.66Eh1XZg-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/bf68be0c39b8ecc4223b948a9ee126af167d74f0 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220411-001048 git checkout bf68be0c39b8ecc4223b948a9ee126af167d74f0 # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): s390-linux-ld: fs/xfs/xfs_buf.o: in function `xfs_alloc_buftarg': >> xfs_buf.c:(.text+0x9920): undefined reference to `xfs_dax_holder_operations' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp