From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7227C433EF for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0354D6B0072; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:53:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F25F66B0073; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:53:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DD2406B0074; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:53:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.26]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1026B0072 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 13:53:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A214B1D16 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:53:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79345345422.06.83D3E85 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890AB40009 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:53:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649699610; x=1681235610; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Jkn38CH+TLuRx2bS/MDc8mvYYyTgqgM3nTnRqd60oAk=; b=aF7yp/muCdjYL3lB+pbA60Wm/N/4ySbOJ3/2UJp8jibewawAH4HjT/5C YjOl4sya44545QQyJmRtswLG1mKojklYy5WyZ4WizJQGpNP7m34gOzhLi h+myM+k/YOqACa8oUqMSd3vPtY6Tc1caA0dz+FRDVoLXQA92QvjSMk7MT wq3ypQZkfxbPkKV6IWAZQONaYghJB1eD2E9cebIxxTBCSLudcnjVqc40m KnC9w1S8VtP9YhGfyCVocj07YrgVOTXJCsZvjN/ejkMDymNkOhjMflya9 b3bD/4hURkviLgGJIBEqvEorO7SF/Q0YdsXAmYwy6iqbZ+pMPiWOjxl4K w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10314"; a="262357267" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,252,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="262357267" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2022 10:53:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,252,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="854018585" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO d3fc50ef50de) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2022 10:53:26 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d3fc50ef50de with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ndyEA-00022A-3i; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:53:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:52:45 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Greg Hackmann Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers , Tri Vo , Peter Oberparleiter , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Yu Zhao , Sean Paul Subject: [jsarha:topic/chromeos-4.19-s0ix 9206/9999] kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:162:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'within_module'; did you mean 'init_module'? Message-ID: <202204120122.ULP2Vs6G-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="aF7yp/mu"; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.115) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 890AB40009 X-Stat-Signature: it7xts191yax1xb4qw35kzy69eanem19 X-HE-Tag: 1649699610-201901 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Greg, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://github.com/jsarha/linux topic/chromeos-4.19-s0ix head: 430bdaa0a8c38697780f45a148964d71951df11f commit: 35be48648a6552869bd5d6c9a0d278102d23d46c [9206/9999] UPSTREAM: gcov: clang support config: openrisc-randconfig-s032-20220411 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220412/202204120122.ULP2Vs6G-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # apt-get install sparse # sparse version: v0.6.4-dirty # https://github.com/jsarha/linux/commit/35be48648a6552869bd5d6c9a0d278102d23d46c git remote add jsarha https://github.com/jsarha/linux git fetch --no-tags jsarha topic/chromeos-4.19-s0ix git checkout 35be48648a6552869bd5d6c9a0d278102d23d46c # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash M=kernel/gcov If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c: In function 'gcov_info_within_module': >> kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:162:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'within_module'; did you mean 'init_module'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 162 | return within_module((unsigned long)info, mod); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | init_module cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +162 kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c 152 153 /** 154 * gcov_info_within_module - check if a profiling data set belongs to a module 155 * @info: profiling data set 156 * @mod: module 157 * 158 * Returns true if profiling data belongs module, false otherwise. 159 */ 160 bool gcov_info_within_module(struct gcov_info *info, struct module *mod) 161 { > 162 return within_module((unsigned long)info, mod); 163 } 164 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp