From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 06/12] x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:19:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427141914.s7y7lhlaau473mu7@box.shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427001756.xefhkwwc7uhxuusk@amd.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:17:56PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:39:28AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > The firmware will pre-accept the memory used to run the stub. But, the
> > stub is responsible for accepting the memory into which it decompresses
> > the main kernel. Accept memory just before decompression starts.
> >
> > The stub is also responsible for choosing a physical address in which to
> > place the decompressed kernel image. The KASLR mechanism will randomize
> > this physical address. Since the unaccepted memory region is relatively
> > small, KASLR would be quite ineffective if it only used the pre-accepted
> > area (EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY). Ensure that KASLR randomizes among the
> > entire physical address space by also including EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMOR
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c | 9 +++++++++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h | 2 ++
> > 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> > index 7f672f7e2fea..b59007e57cbf 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile
> > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ endif
> >
> > vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += $(obj)/acpi.o
> > vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST) += $(obj)/tdx.o $(obj)/tdcall.o
> > -vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY) += $(obj)/bitmap.o $(obj)/mem.o
> > +vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY) += $(obj)/bitmap.o $(obj)/find.o $(obj)/mem.o
>
> Since it's possible to have CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY=y while
> CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST=n (e.g. for SNP-only guest kernels), this can
> result in mem.o reporting linker errors due to tdx_accept_memory() not
> being defined. I think it needs a stub for !CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST, or
> something along that line.
Fair enough. This would do the trick:
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
index 539fff27de49..4a49a2438180 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ static bool is_tdx_guest(void)
static bool once;
static bool is_tdx;
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST))
+ return false;
+
if (!once) {
u32 eax, sig[3];
> > vmlinux-objs-$(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED) += $(obj)/efi_thunk_$(BITS).o
> > efi-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_STUB) = $(objtree)/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > index 411b268bc0a2..59db90626042 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > @@ -725,10 +725,20 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
> > * but in practice there's firmware where using that memory leads
> > * to crashes.
> > *
> > - * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY is guaranteed to be free.
> > + * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY and EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY (if
> > + * supported) are guaranteed to be free.
> > */
> > - if (md->type != EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
> > +
> > + switch (md->type) {
> > + case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
> > + break;
> > + case EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY:
>
> Just FYI, but with latest tip boot/compressed now relies on a separate header
> in arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h where this need to be defined again.
Right.
Borislav, how do you want to handle this? Do you want me to rebase the
tree to a specific branch?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-25 3:39 [PATCHv5 00/12] mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 01/12] x86/boot/: Centralize __pa()/__va() definitions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 7:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-25 7:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 02/12] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-28 10:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-03 20:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-06 0:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 03/12] efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820() Kirill A. Shutemov
[not found] ` <YmmmpxVDyc3R5K2t@zn.tnic>
2022-04-27 23:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 04/12] x86/boot: Add infrastructure required for unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-29 10:58 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-02 13:38 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 05/12] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-29 10:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-02 13:40 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 06/12] x86/boot/compressed: Handle " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-27 0:17 ` Michael Roth
2022-04-27 14:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2022-05-03 14:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-29 13:10 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-03 14:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-06 15:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-10 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-13 5:31 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-05-13 5:34 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-05-13 9:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-13 14:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-16 6:46 ` Xu, Min M
2022-05-31 22:37 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-05-31 22:40 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-01 15:49 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-01 16:20 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-01 19:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-06-01 21:19 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-02 12:51 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-06-02 15:31 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-07 17:28 ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-06-07 18:15 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 07/12] x86/mm: Reserve unaccepted memory bitmap Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-29 13:19 ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-04 11:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 08/12] x86/mm: Provide helpers for unaccepted memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-04 11:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-06 16:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-10 18:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-11 1:15 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 09/12] x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 10/12] x86/tdx: Unaccepted memory support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-05 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-05-06 20:44 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11 1:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 11/12] mm/vmstat: Add counter for memory accepting Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCHv5 12/12] x86/mm: Report unaccepted memory in /proc/meminfo Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427141914.s7y7lhlaau473mu7@box.shutemov.name \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).