linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/18] xfs: add async buffered write support
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:54:42 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220428215442.GW1098723@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30f2920c-5262-7cb0-05b5-6e84a76162a7@fb.com>

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/26/22 3:56 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:43:28AM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> >> This adds the async buffered write support to XFS. For async buffered
> >> write requests, the request will return -EAGAIN if the ilock cannot be
> >> obtained immediately.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 10 ++++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> >> index 6f9da1059e8b..49d54b939502 100644
> >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> >> @@ -739,12 +739,14 @@ xfs_file_buffered_write(
> >>  	bool			cleared_space = false;
> >>  	int			iolock;
> >>  
> >> -	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
> >> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >> -
> >>  write_retry:
> >>  	iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> >> -	xfs_ilock(ip, iolock);
> >> +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
> >> +		if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, iolock))
> >> +			return -EAGAIN;
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		xfs_ilock(ip, iolock);
> >> +	}
> > 
> > xfs_ilock_iocb().
> > 
> 
> The helper xfs_ilock_iocb cannot be used as it hardcoded to use iocb->ki_filp to
> get a pointer to the xfs_inode.

And the problem with that is?

I mean, look at what xfs_file_buffered_write() does to get the
xfs_inode 10 lines about that change:

xfs_file_buffered_write(
        struct kiocb            *iocb,
        struct iov_iter         *from)
{
        struct file             *file = iocb->ki_filp;
        struct address_space    *mapping = file->f_mapping;
        struct inode            *inode = mapping->host;
        struct xfs_inode        *ip = XFS_I(inode);

In what cases does file_inode(iocb->ki_filp) point to a different
inode than iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host? The dio write path assumes
that file_inode(iocb->ki_filp) is correct, as do both the buffered
and dio read paths.

What makes the buffered write path special in that
file_inode(iocb->ki_filp) is not correctly set whilst
iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host is?

Regardless, if this is a problem, then just pass the XFS inode to
xfs_ilock_iocb() and this is a moot point.

> However here we need to use iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host.
> I'll split off new helper for this in the next version of the patch.

We don't need a new helper here, either.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-26 17:43 [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/18] block: add check for async buffered writes to generic_write_checks Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/18] mm: add FGP_ATOMIC flag to __filemap_get_folio() Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 19:06   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-04-28 19:54     ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/18] iomap: add iomap_page_create_gfp to allocate iomap_pages Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/18] iomap: use iomap_page_create_gfp() in __iomap_write_begin Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/18] iomap: add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/18] xfs: add iomap " Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 22:54   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 20:03     ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-28 21:44       ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/18] fs: split off need_remove_file_privs() do_remove_file_privs() Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/18] fs: split off need_file_update_time and do_file_update_time Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/18] fs: add pending file update time flag Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] xfs: Enable async write file modification handling Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 22:55   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 12:07   ` Christian Brauner
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/18] xfs: add async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 22:56   ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 19:58     ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-28 21:54       ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-05-02 21:21         ` Stefan Roesch
2022-05-06  9:29           ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 19:32             ` Stefan Roesch
2022-05-09 23:24               ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 23:44                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-10  1:12                   ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-10  6:47                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-16  2:24                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-16 13:39                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/18] io_uring: add support for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/18] io_uring: add tracepoint for short writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/18] sched: add new fields to task_struct Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/18] mm: support write throttling for async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-04-28 17:47   ` Jan Kara
2022-04-28 20:16     ` Stefan Roesch
2022-05-10  9:50       ` Jan Kara
2022-05-10 20:16         ` Stefan Roesch
2022-05-11 10:38           ` Jan Kara
2022-05-13 18:57             ` Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/18] iomap: User " Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/18] io_uring: support write " Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/18] xfs: enable async buffered write support Stefan Roesch
2022-04-26 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] io-uring/xfs: support async buffered writes Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220428215442.GW1098723@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shr@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).