linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Soheil Hassas Yeganeh" <soheil@google.com>,
	"Feng Tang" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	"Oliver Sang" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] memcg: optimize charge codepath
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:05:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825000506.239406-1-shakeelb@google.com> (raw)

Recently Linux networking stack has moved from a very old per socket
pre-charge caching to per-cpu caching to avoid pre-charge fragmentation
and unwarranted OOMs. One impact of this change is that for network
traffic workloads, memcg charging codepath can become a bottleneck. The
kernel test robot has also reported this regression[1]. This patch
series tries to improve the memcg charging for such workloads.

This patch series implement three optimizations:
(A) Reduce atomic ops in page counter update path.
(B) Change layout of struct page_counter to eliminate false sharing
    between usage and high.
(C) Increase the memcg charge batch to 64.

To evaluate the impact of these optimizations, on a 72 CPUs machine, we
ran the following workload in root memcg and then compared with scenario
where the workload is run in a three level of cgroup hierarchy with top
level having min and low setup appropriately.

 $ netserver -6
 # 36 instances of netperf with following params
 $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K

Results (average throughput of netperf):
1. root memcg		21694.8 Mbps
2. 6.0-rc1		10482.7 Mbps (-51.6%)
3. 6.0-rc1 + (A)	14542.5 Mbps (-32.9%)
4. 6.0-rc1 + (B)	12413.7 Mbps (-42.7%)
5. 6.0-rc1 + (C)	17063.7 Mbps (-21.3%)
6. 6.0-rc1 + (A+B+C)	20120.3 Mbps (-7.2%)

With all three optimizations, the memcg overhead of this workload has
been reduced from 51.6% to just 7.2%.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220619150456.GB34471@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/

Changes since v1:
- Commit message updates
- Instead of explicit padding add align compiler option with struct

Shakeel Butt (3):
  mm: page_counter: remove unneeded atomic ops for low/min
  mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page_counter fields
  memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64

 include/linux/memcontrol.h   |  7 ++++---
 include/linux/page_counter.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 mm/page_counter.c            | 13 ++++++-------
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog



             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25  0:05 Shakeel Butt [this message]
2022-08-25  0:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: page_counter: remove unneeded atomic ops for low/min Shakeel Butt
2022-08-25  6:43   ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-25  0:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: page_counter: rearrange struct page_counter fields Shakeel Butt
2022-08-25  0:33   ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-25  4:41     ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-25  5:21       ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-25 15:24         ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-25  6:47   ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-25 15:25     ` Shakeel Butt
2022-08-25  0:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64 Shakeel Butt
2022-08-25  6:49   ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-25  8:30   ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220825000506.239406-1-shakeelb@google.com \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).