From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/8] mm/mm_init.c: use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:33:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220923033347.3935160-6-liushixin2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220923033347.3935160-1-liushixin2@huawei.com>
Since patch 316346243be6 has already updated the minimum gcc version to 5.1.
The previous problem mentioned in patch f02c69680088 is not existed. So we
can now revert to use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly rather than
register_hotmemory_notifier().
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/mm_init.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 0d7b2bd2454a..44aadc162d1f 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -178,16 +178,10 @@ static int __meminit mm_compute_batch_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
-static struct notifier_block compute_batch_nb __meminitdata = {
- .notifier_call = mm_compute_batch_notifier,
- .priority = IPC_CALLBACK_PRI, /* use lowest priority */
-};
-
static int __init mm_compute_batch_init(void)
{
mm_compute_batch(sysctl_overcommit_memory);
- register_hotmemory_notifier(&compute_batch_nb);
-
+ hotplug_memory_notifier(mm_compute_batch_notifier, IPC_CALLBACK_PRI);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-23 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-23 3:33 [PATCH v4 0/8] mm: Use hotplug_memory_notifier() instead of register_hotmemory_notifier() Liu Shixin
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] cgroup/cpuset: use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly Liu Shixin
2022-10-18 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] fs/proc/kcore.c: " Liu Shixin
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] mm/slub.c: " Liu Shixin
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] mm/mmap: " Liu Shixin
2022-09-23 3:33 ` Liu Shixin [this message]
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] ACPI: HMAT: " Liu Shixin
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] memory: remove unused register_hotmemory_notifier() Liu Shixin
2022-09-23 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-23 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] memory: move hotplug memory notifier priority to same file for easy sorting Liu Shixin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220923033347.3935160-6-liushixin2@huawei.com \
--to=liushixin2@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).