From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC57EC352A2 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580D1218AC for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FZozRYbw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 580D1218AC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id F3A416B0010; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:38:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EC31C6B0032; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:38:30 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D63906B0036; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:38:30 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0229.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.229]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76A96B0010 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 08:38:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81027181AEF07 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:38:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76456177980.02.sock73_846ef3043e900 X-HE-Tag: sock73_846ef3043e900 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 9382 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:38:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580909909; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=Agz9OOSwh/kMogylLZTc8aqiR/PYROY7DvCwBwmTAoo=; b=FZozRYbwCF56m1ZDuKIhiSHyGYzt9vTsndJPuA0ei811otq/IlE2SWY03uINlLCNyITn30 a9Uq1uEASD+9pu++2yYEkM6uk6JA6J2SvUkSKHb/95Z8+lJ6uhSHrjYituwVVsruU0LAYW 3rlrJuV7MO8nYUqCQHwhUjm2OE+w5og= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-266-SGBxGYQQOZyggmt3BmxcNA-1; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:38:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: SGBxGYQQOZyggmt3BmxcNA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C391190B2AF; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.217] (ovpn-116-217.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.217]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415235DA83; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span() To: Baoquan He Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Michal Hocko , Pavel Tatashin , Dan Williams , Wei Yang References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> <20191006085646.5768-9-david@redhat.com> <20200204142516.GD26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200205124329.GE26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200205133442.GC8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <2868343a-745b-e2b6-7e78-d5649c00ee31@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:38:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200205133442.GC8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 05.02.20 14:34, Baoquan He wrote: > On 02/05/20 at 02:20pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 05.02.20 13:43, Baoquan He wrote: >>> On 02/04/20 at 03:42pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 04.02.20 15:25, Baoquan He wrote: >>>>> On 10/06/19 at 10:56am, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>>> If we have holes, the holes will automatically get detected and removed >>>>>> once we remove the next bigger/smaller section. The extra checks can >>>>>> go. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton >>>>>> Cc: Oscar Salvador >>>>>> Cc: Michal Hocko >>>>>> Cc: David Hildenbrand >>>>>> Cc: Pavel Tatashin >>>>>> Cc: Dan Williams >>>>>> Cc: Wei Yang >>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >>>>>> --- >>>>>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 34 +++++++--------------------------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >>>>>> index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644 >>>>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c >>>>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >>>>>> @@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, >>>>>> if (pfn) { >>>>>> zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn; >>>>>> zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn; >>>>>> + } else { >>>>>> + zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; >>>>>> + zone->spanned_pages = 0; >>>>>> } >>>>>> } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) { >>>>>> /* >>>>>> @@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, >>>>>> start_pfn); >>>>>> if (pfn) >>>>>> zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1; >>>>>> + else { >>>>>> + zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; >>>>>> + zone->spanned_pages = 0; >>>>> >>>>> Thinking in which case (zone_start_pfn != start_pfn) and it comes here. >>>> >>>> Could only happen in case the zone_start_pfn would have been "out of the >>>> zone already". If you ask me: unlikely :) >>> >>> Yeah, I also think it's unlikely to come here. >>> >>> The 'if (zone_start_pfn == start_pfn)' checking also covers the case >>> (zone_start_pfn == start_pfn && zone_end_pfn == end_pfn). So this >>> zone_start_pfn/spanned_pages resetting can be removed to avoid >>> confusion. >> >> At least I would find it more confusing without it (or want a comment >> explaining why this does not have to be handled and why the !pfn case is >> not possible). > > I don't get why being w/o it will be more confusing, but it's OK since > it doesn't impact anything. Because we could actually BUG_ON(!pfn) here, right? Only having a "if (pfn)" leaves the reader wondering "why is the other case not handled". > >> >> Anyhow, that patch is already upstream and I don't consider this high >> priority. Thanks :) > > Yeah, noticed you told Wei the status in another patch thread, I am fine > with it, just leave it to you to decide. Thanks. I am fairly busy right now. Can you send a patch (double-checking and making this eventually unconditional?). Thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb