linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	syzbot <syzbot+bfdded10ab7dcd7507ae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:58:15 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b90c488-a6b9-2565-bd3a-e4f8bf8404e9@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCZ056SJDGrgXCss@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 2021/02/12 21:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 12-02-21 12:22:07, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:18:11PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>>> On 2021/02/12 1:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> But I suspect we have drifted away from the original issue. I thought
>>>> that a simple check would help us narrow down this particular case and
>>>> somebody messing up from the IRQ context didn't sound like a completely
>>>> off.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  From my experience at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/201409192053.IHJ35462.JLOMOSOFFVtQFH@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp ,
>>> I think we can replace direct PF_* manipulation with macros which do not receive "struct task_struct *" argument.
>>> Since TASK_PFA_TEST()/TASK_PFA_SET()/TASK_PFA_CLEAR() are for manipulating PFA_* flags on a remote thread, we can
>>> define similar ones for manipulating PF_* flags on current thread. Then, auditing dangerous users becomes easier.
>>
>> No, nobody is manipulating another task's GFP flags.
> 
> Agreed. And nobody should be manipulating PF flags on remote tasks
> either.
> 

No. You are misunderstanding. The bug report above is an example of manipulating PF flags on remote tasks.
You say "nobody should", but the reality is "there indeed was". There might be unnoticed others. The point of
this proposal is to make it possible to "find such unnoticed users who are manipulating PF flags on remote tasks".


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <000000000000563a0205bafb7970@google.com>
2021-02-11 10:49 ` possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2) Jan Kara
2021-02-11 10:55   ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-11 11:22   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-11 11:28     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-11 12:10       ` Jan Kara
2021-02-11 12:34         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-11 12:57           ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-11 13:07             ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-11 13:25               ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-11 14:20                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-11 14:26                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-11 16:41                     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 11:18                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-02-12 12:22                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-12 12:30                           ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 12:58                             ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2021-02-12 13:12                               ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 13:34                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-02-12 15:43                               ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-13 10:58                                 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-11 13:18             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-02-11 11:46     ` Jan Kara
2021-02-13 14:26   ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-02-15 12:45     ` Jan Kara
2021-02-15 14:06       ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-02-15 14:29         ` Jan Kara
2021-02-19 10:15           ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-02-19 17:22             ` harshad shirwadkar
2021-03-20 10:02           ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b90c488-a6b9-2565-bd3a-e4f8bf8404e9@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=syzbot+bfdded10ab7dcd7507ae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).