From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f70.google.com (mail-wm0-f70.google.com [74.125.82.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AAD6B0253 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 14:52:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f70.google.com with SMTP id p129so54101730wmp.3 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uc1si7365500wjc.93.2016.07.23.11.52.26 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mempool: do not consume memory reserves from the reclaim path References: <1468831164-26621-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <1468831285-27242-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20160719135426.GA31229@cmpxchg.org> <20160720081541.GF11249@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160721085202.GC26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160721121300.GA21806@cmpxchg.org> <20160721145309.GR26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160722063720.GB794@dhcp22.suse.cz> <15177f2d-cd00-dade-fc25-12a0c241e8f5@suse.cz> <20160722124448.ad6f9b8be8fe1552b076096c@linux-foundation.org> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <32d24e54-d5de-1b84-7ac3-cc4c41767657@suse.cz> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:52:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160722124448.ad6f9b8be8fe1552b076096c@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , David Rientjes , linux-mm@kvack.org, Mikulas Patocka , Ondrej Kozina , Tetsuo Handa , Mel Gorman , Neil Brown , LKML , dm-devel@redhat.com On 07/22/2016 09:44 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:26:19 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 07/22/2016 08:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Thu 21-07-16 16:53:09, Michal Hocko wrote: >>>> From d64815758c212643cc1750774e2751721685059a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Michal Hocko >>>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:40:59 +0200 >>>> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm, mempool: only set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are >>>> free elements" >>>> >>>> This reverts commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23. >>> >>> I've noticed that Andrew has already picked this one up. Is anybody >>> against marking it for stable? >> >> It would be strange to have different behavior with known regression in >> 4.6 and 4.7 stables. Actually, there's still time for 4.7 proper? >> > > I added the cc:stable. > > Do we need to bust a gut to rush it into 4.7? It sounds safer to let > it bake for a while, fix it in 4.7.1? Yeah, I guess it's safer to wait now. Would be different if the reverted commit went in the same cycle. > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org