From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f70.google.com (mail-vk0-f70.google.com [209.85.213.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92EB6B0279 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:15:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f70.google.com with SMTP id y70so13522271vky.13 for ; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 10:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com. [141.146.126.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 52si1969158uah.167.2017.07.07.10.14.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jul 2017 10:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/mremap: add MREMAP_MIRROR flag for existing mirroring functionality References: <1499357846-7481-1-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> <1499357846-7481-2-git-send-email-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> From: Mike Kravetz Message-ID: <3a43d5fa-223d-1315-513b-85d3a09a07b6@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:14:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Michal Hocko , Aaron Lu , "Kirill A . Shutemov" On 07/07/2017 01:45 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 07/06/2017 09:47 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> The mremap system call has the ability to 'mirror' parts of an existing >> mapping. To do so, it creates a new mapping that maps the same pages as >> the original mapping, just at a different virtual address. This >> functionality has existed since at least the 2.6 kernel. >> >> This patch simply adds a new flag to mremap which will make this >> functionality part of the API. It maintains backward compatibility with >> the existing way of requesting mirroring (old_size == 0). >> >> If this new MREMAP_MIRROR flag is specified, then new_size must equal >> old_size. In addition, the MREMAP_MAYMOVE flag must be specified. > > Yeah it all looks good. But why is this requirement that if > MREMAP_MAYMOVE is specified then old_size and new_size must > be equal. No real reason. I just wanted to clearly separate the new interface from the old. On second thought, it would be better to require old_size == 0 as in the legacy interface. -- Mike Kravetz -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org