From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C34C4361B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745D923A52 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:15:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 745D923A52 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E51566B005C; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:15:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E02046B005D; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:15:07 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D3F556B0068; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:15:07 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0101.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.101]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7656B005C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:15:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8327A1EE6 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77569404654.10.turn98_4d14529273e5 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D73216A4AB for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: turn98_4d14529273e5 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2883 Received: from out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.43]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:15:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R191e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04407;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=11;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UHy7DrU_1607415299; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.local(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UHy7DrU_1607415299) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:14:59 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] mm: don't pass "enum lru_list" to lru list addition functions To: Yu Zhao , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins Cc: Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Roman Gushchin , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20201207220949.830352-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20201207220949.830352-4-yuzhao@google.com> From: Alex Shi Message-ID: <444fa3b9-2263-4f0a-3ff3-beaf2472f23f@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:14:58 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201207220949.830352-4-yuzhao@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: =E5=9C=A8 2020/12/8 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=886:09, Yu Zhao =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > =20 > __count_vm_events(PGACTIVATE, nr_pages); > @@ -543,14 +542,14 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *p= age, struct lruvec *lruvec) > * It can make readahead confusing. But race window > * is _really_ small and it's non-critical problem. > */ > - add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); > + add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec); > SetPageReclaim(page); > } else { > /* > * The page's writeback ends up during pagevec > * We moves tha page into tail of inactive. > */ > - add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page, lruvec, lru); > + add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page, lruvec); > __count_vm_events(PGROTATED, nr_pages); > } > =20 > @@ -570,7 +569,7 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, st= ruct lruvec *lruvec) > del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE); > ClearPageActive(page); > ClearPageReferenced(page); > - add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); > + add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec); > =20 > __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_pages); > __count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), PGDEACTIVATE, seems leave the lru =3D xxx out, could save 2 function calling in lru_dea= ctivate_file_fn(), is this right?