From: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/4] memblock tests: add simulation of physical memory with multiple NUMA nodes
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:21:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4566d816a85f009268d4858d1ef06c7571a960f9.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
Add function setup_numa_memblock() for setting up a memory layout with
multiple NUMA nodes in a previously allocated dummy physical memory.
This function can be used in place of setup_memblock() in tests that need
to simulate a NUMA system.
setup_numa_memblock():
- allows for setting up a memory layout by specifying the fraction of
MEM_SIZE in each node
Set CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT to 4 when building with NUMA=1 to allow for up to
16 NUMA nodes.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
---
.../testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include | 2 +-
tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 4 ++-
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include b/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include
index aa6d82d56a23..998281723590 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
# Simulate CONFIG_NUMA=y
ifeq ($(NUMA), 1)
- CFLAGS += -D CONFIG_NUMA
+ CFLAGS += -D CONFIG_NUMA -D CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=4
endif
# Use 32 bit physical addresses.
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
index eec6901081af..3f795047bbe1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS
#define PREFIXES_MAX 15
#define DELIM ": "
+#define BASIS 10000
static struct test_memory memory_block;
static const char __maybe_unused *prefixes[PREFIXES_MAX];
@@ -72,6 +73,36 @@ void setup_memblock(void)
fill_memblock();
}
+/**
+ * setup_numa_memblock:
+ * Set up a memory layout with multiple NUMA nodes in a previously allocated
+ * dummy physical memory.
+ * @node_fracs: an array representing the fraction of MEM_SIZE contained in
+ * each node in basis point units (one hundredth of 1% or 1/10000).
+ * For example, if node 0 should contain 1/8 of MEM_SIZE,
+ * node_fracs[0] = 1250.
+ *
+ * The nids will be set to 0 through NUMA_NODES - 1.
+ */
+void setup_numa_memblock(const unsigned int node_fracs[])
+{
+ phys_addr_t base;
+ int flags;
+
+ reset_memblock_regions();
+ base = (phys_addr_t)memory_block.base;
+ flags = (movable_node_is_enabled()) ? MEMBLOCK_NONE : MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < NUMA_NODES; i++) {
+ assert(node_fracs[i] <= BASIS);
+ phys_addr_t size = MEM_SIZE * node_fracs[i] / BASIS;
+
+ memblock_add_node(base, size, i, flags);
+ base += size;
+ }
+ fill_memblock();
+}
+
void dummy_physical_memory_init(void)
{
memory_block.base = malloc(MEM_SIZE);
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
index 78128e109a95..def71648887f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <../selftests/kselftest.h>
-#define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K
+#define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K
+#define NUMA_NODES 8
enum test_flags {
/* No special request. */
@@ -102,6 +103,7 @@ struct region {
void reset_memblock_regions(void);
void reset_memblock_attributes(void);
void setup_memblock(void);
+void setup_numa_memblock(const unsigned int node_fracs[]);
void dummy_physical_memory_init(void);
void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void);
void parse_args(int argc, char **argv);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-13 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 5:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] memblock tests: add NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid* Rebecca Mckeever
2022-09-13 5:21 ` Rebecca Mckeever [this message]
2022-09-13 5:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] memblock tests: add top-down " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-09-13 5:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] memblock tests: add bottom-up " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-09-13 5:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] memblock tests: add generic " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-09-18 7:32 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] memblock tests: add " Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4566d816a85f009268d4858d1ef06c7571a960f9.1663046060.git.remckee0@gmail.com \
--to=remckee0@gmail.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).